InspectAPedia®

FPE breaker failed to trip - this is a typical breaker side blow-out that occurs.Calibration & Condition Tests Of Molded Case Circuit Breakers
Federal Pacific Stab Lok Breakers - CPSC Data

  • CPSC FPE FAILURE DATA 1982 - CONTENTS: Federal Pacific Electric FPE Panel/Breaker Failure Rates - Calibration and Condition Tests of Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Final Report: Contract CPSC-C-81-1429 December 30, 1982
  • POST a QUESTION or READ FAQs about the safety of and failure rate of FPE Stab Lok circuit breakers
  • REFERENCES
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.

FPE Sab-Lok circuit breaker failure rate data:

This article presents research data demonstrating the failure rates of Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® circuit breakers.



Green links show where you are. © Copyright 2017 InspectApedia.com, All Rights Reserved.

FPE Stab-Lok® Calibration Test Report - Failure Rate Summary

CPSC-C-81-1429 December 30, 1982
Final Report: Contract CPSC-C-81-1429
Date: December 30, 1982
Submitted by: Jesse Aronstein (original contains signature)
WRIGHTVM MALTA CORPORATION. Malta test station, Ballston Spa, New York 12020 518-899-2227

1.0 SUMMARY

Calibration tests have been performed on 122 two-pole Federal Pacific Electric circuit breakers. The calibration tests were performed -in accordance with UL Standard 489 except for or a difference in the sequence of calibrations. UL 489 is the applicable standard that the breakers are presumed to meet. In most cases, the calibration tests were repeated after 500 off-on mechanical operations of the toggle handle..

The circuit breakers tested were supplied by CPSC and came from several sources. Most were provided to CPSC by Federal Pacific Electric, some were purchased new by CPSC staff members at retail outlets, and a few were removed from existing installations. The breaker ratings tested were 30 A (30 two-pole breakers tested), 40A (35), 50A(20), 60A(7) and 80A (30). The tests include performance at 100%, 135%, and 200% of ratings, and dielectric tests.

A substantial number of breakers failed the calibrations testing, both before and after the mechanical toggle operations. Failures were evident with both poles carrying current as well as with one-pole operation. Specifically, the failures are summarized as follows:

FAILURE CONDITION

FAILURES

% (#failed / #tested)

Before Mechanical Operations

After Mechanical Operations

No-trip: 200% of rating, both poles

0% (0/122)

1% (1/107)

No-trip: 200% of rating, individual poles

1% (3/244)

10% (21/214)

No-trip: 135% of rating, both poles*

25% (31/122)

36% (39/107)

No-trip: 135% of rating, individual poles

51% (125/244)

65% (144/220)

Trip: 100% of rating, both poles*

3% (4/122)

6% (7/111)

Dielectric Breakdown (short)*

0

1% (1/111)

TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FAILURES

*UL 489 Test Conditions

The failures appeared. among breakers of all ratings, none were failure-free. Most of the "no-trip' conditions were sustained for four hours well beyond the UL specification. These were not marginal failures with respect to the failure criteria. The data suggests that, on the average, the mechanical operations result in increased failures. This was .'not strictly the case on a sample-to-sample basis.

 The failures relate to hazardous conditions in at least two ways. First, a fault in the wiring or utilization equipment which causes excessive- current-can result in fire if the circuit is not opened by the breaker -- this is its principal functional requirement.

Secondly, it was determined in these tests that some of the breakers overheat to hazardous levels when subjected to overcurrent conditions (due to their own failure to trip) for sustained periods of time.

The overheating can result in incapacitation of the breaker (i.e.: it will no longer open under any condition), and the temperature can be high enough to ignite fire in the vicinity of the breaker, as evidenced by charring of the case on some samples.

NOTE: this text is quoted verbatim from pages 3-5 of "Calibration and Condition Tests of Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Final Report: Contract CPSC-C-81-1429 December 30, 1982," obtained from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission as a FOIA request.

...


Continue reading at FPE INVESTIGATION CPSC 1982 or select a topic from closely-related articles below, or see our complete INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES below.

Suggested citation for this web page

CPSC FPE FAILURE DATA 1982 at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.

INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES: ARTICLE INDEX to ARTICLE INDEX to FPE STAB-LOK BREAKERS & PANELS

Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia


...

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Click to Show or Hide FAQs

Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Questions & answers or comments about the safety of and failure rate of FPE Stab Lok circuit breakers.

Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.

Search the InspectApedia website

Comment Box is loading comments...

Technical Reviewers & References

Click to Show or Hide Citations & References

Publisher's Google+ Page by Daniel Friedman