Asbestos hazard recognition, danger assessment, remediation, removal or cleanup: home page and index to key articles about how to recognize asbestos in buildings and what to do about it.
Here is a visual guide to identifying asbestos in buildings.
This article series assists building buyers, owners or inspectors who need to identify asbestos materials (or probable-asbestos) in buildings by simple visual inspection.
In the articles listed below, we provide photographs and descriptive text of asbestos insulation, asbestos floor tiles, asbestos siding, asbestos roofing, and other asbestos-containing products to permit identification of definite, probable, or possible asbestos materials in buildings.
We discuss asbestos safety advice & asbestos hazard reduction. Asbestos cleanup advice. Certification & Licensing for Asbestos Abatement, Removal, & Cleanup Companies. Are Carbon Nanotube Health Risks Similar to Asbestos? List of major U.S. Asbestos Product Producers & Companies
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.
- Daniel Friedman, Publisher/Editor/Author - See WHO ARE WE?
While an expert lab test using polarized light microscopy (and in some cases TEM) may be needed to identify the specific type of
asbestos fiber, the percentage content of asbestos in a material, or to identify the presence of asbestos in air or dust samples,
many asbestos-containing building products
not only are visually obvious and easy to recognize, but since there were not other look-alike products that were not asbestos, a visual identification of this material can be virtually a certainty in many cases.
Our photo shows an asbestos identification tag provided and glued to old asbestos insulation on heating pipes.
The US EPA indicates that not all asbestos-containing products are dangerous.
A health risk exists only when asbestos fibers are released from a product [into the air where they are inhaled for example]. Products that are friable (easily crumbled or made into dust that is easily airborne) are more dangerous than products in which binders immobilize the asbestos fibers.
EPA also indicates that not everyone exposed to asbestos will develop an asbestos-related illness or disease. Most people exposed to small amounts of asbestos do not develop asbestos-related health problems. Cigarette smokers are at much higher risk of asbestos-related disease.
Quoting from the US EPA Basic Advice on asbestos in homes: [REFERENCES]
The best thing to do is to leave asbestos-containing material that is in good condition alone.
If unsure whether or not the material contains asbestos, you may consider hiring a professional asbestos inspector to sample and test the material for you.
Before you have your house remodeled, you should find out whether asbestos-containing materials are present.
If asbestos-containing material is becoming damaged
(i.e., unraveling, frayed, breaking apart) you should immediately isolate the area (keep pets and children away from the area) and refrain from disturbing the material (either by touching it or walking on it).
You should then immediately contact an asbestos professional for consultation.
It is best to receive an assessment from one firm and any needed abatement from another firm to avoid any conflict of interest.
In such a scenario as described above, asbestos-containing material does not necessarily need to be removed, but may rather be repaired by an asbestos professional via encapsulation or enclosure.
Removal is often unnecessary.
In most cases, it is safest (and least costly) to leave the asbestos-containing materials alone. For Asbestos handling regulations,
see ASBESTOS MATERIAL REGULATIONS
and ASBESTOS REGULATION UPDATES.
Friable, damaged asbestos materials in a living area or such materials located where the asbestos is likely to be carried to an occupied space need professional asbestos remediation.
If you are cleaning-up in a building area where asbestos products may have been dislodged, such as a basement where asbestos pipe insulation has fallen to the floor, the US EPA recommends avoiding causing airborne dust and debris - a condition that could be harmful.
-- US EPA. Our list of asbestos information articles is just below.
How to recognize asbestos materials in buildings, Photographs of asbestos in building products, List of asbestos-containing building materials
As we discuss and share details at ASBESTOS REMOVAL, AMATEUR, INCOMPLETE, building owners arranging for asbestos cleanup, or any other environmental cleanup for that matter, should be sure that the company they are using is properly certified, licensed, and that the work is conducted with proper supervision and by workers who themselves are properly trained.
Failure to take these precautions risks serious consequences including contamination of other building areas by asbestos dust and debris, health risks and harm to the cleanup workers themselves, and future health risks and harm to building occupants as well as potential issues should the property later be offered for sale.
Photo: cement asbestos roof shingles on an older home that we inspected in Newburgh, New York.
Also see ASBESTOS REMOVAL CERTIFICATIONS. Excerpts are below.
Watch out: in 2010 The New York Times reported [paraphrasing from that article] that over a five year period beginning in 2001 hundreds of asbestos-removal training certificates were given to people who had completed no training whatsoever.
... 65 to 80 percent of those receiving certification as qualified asbestos removal experts had not received the necessary training.
An example of a simple asbestos test report from a certified asbestos testing lab is shown in
this ASBESTOS TEST LAB REPORT RESULT .
It will be patently obvious that despite the enormous list of products in which asbestos was used, the list of materials that do not and never did contain asbestos will be still longer - so long we won't attempt to list all such items.
But the question of whether or not certain materials contained harmful levels of asbestos has come up often for certain products.
Those we will describe here.
On the underside of bowling lane floors there is a fiberboard type material I believed was used for sound dampening. I've handled and ripped off this material so many times without once thinking what it was- I think I was told it was homosote and harmless.
Since many of these bowling lanes were installed many years ago, it worried me even more. Now I'm not so sure what it is and scared at the thought of what it could be.
Also, if you have those names or contact info for anyone who might be willing to test this material for me, that would also be incredibly helpful. I can't thank you enough for your help with this- feel free to call or email me back with any information. - A.S. 11/5/2013
The material I can see in your online photos is almost certainly wood fiber based Homasote type insulating board. That is not an asbestos product. You can see more examples of this product
If nevertheless you want to have as sample of the material tested for asbestos content, the cost is usually minor - about $50. U.S. You can use any certified asbestos testing laboratory - and can find one via help given
Details of this question & answer are
at SHEATHING, FIBERBOARD ASBESTOS CONTENT or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.
We are monitoring studies of possible health risks from other products containing carbon nanotubes. The New York Times reported that to date no illnesses have been reported concerning nanotube-containing articles and that current popular consumer products such as tennis rackets that contain nanotubes are of little risk to consumers.
But because nanotube-based fibers are very small, they could pose a health risk.
Consumer caution (not fear) are advised. Carbon nanotubes include bundles of fibers that are similar to but more uniform than naturally-occurring asbestos fibers.
The Times article "In Study, Researchers Find Nanotubes May Pose Health Risks Similar to Asbestos", New York Times 21 May 2008 p. A-22, reported on an article published at the website of the journal Nature NanotechnologyOn 5/21/08.
For details about carbon nanotube health concerns, and health research regarding nanotechnology in industrial or research processes
Also see MICRO-PHOTOGRAPHS OF DUST FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER collapse following the 9/11/01 attack. Links to U.S. government and other authoritative research and advice are included.
...
Below you will find questions and answers previously posted on this page at its page bottom reader comment box.
How do I clean clothing that has been exposed to asbestos in my Canadian home?
Hi, I had to spent 3 hours in this condo (due to work) built 1910 with some walls cut out and whole bathroom taken out. It was dusty there, dust on floor and windows, counters. They are renovating many apartments in this old building(so I am guessing its contractor,not someone DYI) .
Would u be able to tell me if being in this place is a high exposure to asbestos? And mostly what would u suggest to do with all my clothes and shoes I was wearing, can I just wash them or it would be better to throw them out.
What to do with some what didnt get the dust and the ones what got also some dust on.
Please and thank you! (I understand u will most likely be not able to tell from photos if the walls and bahthroom contained asbestos and if the contractor followed guidelines, but just your opinion from your experience how safe was being there and what would u do with the clothes would be really appreciated, thank you!) -On 2023-11-17 by Susan -
Reply by InspectApedia Publisher - how to clean clothing t exposed to asbestos
@Susan,
Depending on the country and city where this building is located contractors may have been required by law to stop work if they suspected that asbestos containing materials were present. That work was started until the area could be assessed and any asbestos abatement required could be completed.
Knowing the building ages well as work that's been done on it can be helpful in guessing at that probability.
In any case if you don't have evidence that you've had an acute exposure to asbestos dust than ordinary laundering of your clothes is certainly sufficient. If the contractors left a dusty mess it would be appropriate to require that to be cleaned up.Followup by Susan
@InspectApedia Publisher, Thank you very much for your answer! Very appreciate it. This is in Canada, west, building built in 1910 year, and I seen other 2 aparments on another floors in that bulding with exact same work done (all bathroom walls out, some walls cut out in rooms) some ppl still living in the other not renovated aparments in that building.
They were not working while I was there, I had to stay there bc my work required for me to wait there for 3 hours (filming of a movie in that bulding and this was offered as a place to stay warm and I do not think they were considering that this could be hazardous). So I am guessing the aparments are between renovations.
From whatever I read about asbestos I read it should to be in totally all joints/mud on the walls in old buildings and since the walls in bahtroom were tore out and some of the walls in rooms were cut out exactly in that joint part, and the dust from that work is still there as when someone put bag or clothes on floor or windows evertyhing was very dusty, doesnt it mean that the dust will 100% contain asbestos?
I think the regulation for cutting walls with asbestos joints in canada is less strict then in US. Thats why after I realized there might be asbestos and how much dust is still there I became really concerned if I was exposed to a lot of hazardoust stuff as well if washing of the clothes will be enough.
If you would have any additional information and advice please let me know. Thank you so much for your help!
Reply by InspectApedia Publisher - drywall or joint compound in your building may well have contained asbestos
@Susan,
Unfortunately without a shred of actual data our discussion becomes far too speculative to be reliable. Bottom line: yes drywall or joint compound in your building may well have contained asbestos. If dust was not properly contained and/or not properly cleaned up then that professional cleanup would be in order.
Throwing away clothes or living in deep panic are costs to your wallet and health that are possibly greater than the actual dust itself.
If it would put your mind at ease now, collect some samples of representative settled dust and have those tested for asbestos, BUT keep in mind that will not tell you much about any hazards you may have faced as we know nothing about the dose or exposure level & duration.Comment by Susan
@InspectApedia Publisher, Thank you very much!So in your experience/knowledge all the joints in older building under 1980 contain asbestos joint/mud?
I am guessing the contractors in canada doesnt test the part where are joints (i heard that they take the sample somehwere in the middle rather so they can still perform their job instead of new asbestos removal company)
because from what i seen any special asbestos precautions were not applied like some plastic walls or after cleaning of the dust, the other rooms what seems not going to be renovated are widely open without cover on the floors, the dusty old bathtub randomly put there.
I guess its a normal thing, since in other old building i was living i seen also drywall cutted out (more then half meter) and no precausions whatsovever, workers casually walking with regular clothes, only have mask.
So in older buildings there must be a lot of asbestos in air in halways since this is how its done and the workers just open the doors of the condos withouth any barier so the air goes everywhere? If all or almost all the mud/joints contains asbestos I just dont understand that any precautiions are made in these older buildings when doing renovations, is this common?
Otherwise I cannot explain that if all/most old joints are asbestos that I never ever seen in these bulding any precuations or workers in plastic suits, and renovations are done here constantly. Just dont know how to feel even safe to rent or visit these old buildings.Reply by InspectApedia Publisher - it is not correct to assume that asbestos is or is not present in an older building
@Susan,
Sorry, but No absolutely not. NO ONE can say with certainty what materials were used in all buildings at any time. The number of people working on buildings around the world is in the millions as is the number of products. We may know what is common or what has been reported or not, but nobody can say for sure what is or is not present in a given building just by text or a photo.
Asbestos was widely used in many products but it is not correct to assume that asbestos is or is not present in an older building. If it has not been done to make such a statement about asbestos, an expert inspection and often actual material testing would be required. Even then such an inspection cannot, without dismantling the whole structure, be certain about materials in inaccessible or hidden areas.
Bottom line: Do not panic about asbestos materials. In general asbestos-containing building materials or materials that *might* contain asbestos are safe and harmless if the materials are undisturbed and in good condition.
What if unknown materials must be disturbed, creating significant levels of dust?
Often on an older building records of just when work was performed, by whom, and using what exact products (brand and manufacturing date and supplier source) is simply not known.In that case, IF dusty demolition of older building drywall walls or ceilings is required then one would either use dust control and cleaning methods that presumed that the materials contained asbestos OR one would have to test sufficient representative samples of the drywall and joint compound to see if asbestos is present.
I am SO SCARED of asbestos: how do I spend my money to be safe?
@InspectApedia Publisher, i read i, and it is true that my concern all came from the articles i read saying how dangerous it is. But i do not quite understand the OPM part, does it mean, like I contact an inspection company, then what they say is always we are not sure, we have to get it tested. then thiis kind of statemnt gives me worrys, makes me want to spend money to ensure safety? - On 2023-10-11 by Anonymous -
Replly by InspectApedia Publisher
@Anonymous,
I recommend that you read HAZARD vs RISK - what's the difference? Something may be hazardous but the probability of occurrence very small, and so less urgent.
and
OTHER PEOPLE's MONEY - if you push too hard people will spend your money to reduce their risk
those should lead you to drop this question.On 2023-10-12 by InspectApedia Publisher
@Anonymous,
Just to make sure I understand, now I see that you're asking about a hairline short crack in the covering of asbestos suspect pipe insulation and a building that you used to live in.
This is a case where the anxiety is more likely to be a health hazard to you than the item itself that you are describing.
And with all due respect I've tried to warn you that if you continue asking questions like this of some environmental professionals, you'll make them so nervous that there's something going to be forced to say yes you need a complete asbestos survey of the building you're used to live in as well as the building you live in now as well as all of your possessions, and you need all of your possessions professionally cleaned.
You need to follow up by thorough multi-sample testing for remains of individual asbestos particles or fibers even at extremely low levels..
Can you see that you're probably talking about many thousands of dollars of expense to address what is most likely a risk beneath the level or limits of detection.That is to say, there's no reasonable conclusion, based just on the information you've given, that there's a meaningful risk.
On 2023-10-09 by Anonymous - Is a hairline crack on asbestos pipe encapsulatoin worriable.
is a hairline crack on asbestos pipe encapsulatoin worriable.
@InspectApedia DF, how big it will be a concern. I was wondering if it is possible for this kind of crack to release fibers upon disturbance like winds and walking vibration. since the crack is still bigger than the fibers
btw, the crack is not on the insulation it was on the encapsulation.
its width is less than 1 millimeter, the length is around a fingers length.
this is the only crack i found and the encapsulation itself is still very hard and smooth in place. do you mean by not concern, that it would not release any fibers in this situation?
On 2023-10-09 by InspectApedia DF (mod) - "is a hairline crack on asbestos pipe encapsulatoin worriable"
@Anonymous,
No, not likely, but of course my answer is a bit of a pig in a poke, that is, speculative, because I can't see your pipe asbestos insulation nor the crack nor whether or not that's the only possible concern.
To me a "hairline crack" means a crack less in width than a human hair - about 0.008 to 0.01 cm in width or about as wide as the thickness of a piece of paper, in one location, and of perhaps just a few inches in length, and absent any indication of other damage to the pipe insulation - it all remains securely in place and undisturbed. That'd not be a concern.
Though to allay any concern, you could certainly spray a bit of encapsulant paint over the crack.
On 2023-10-07 by Anonymous - Is asbestos more dangerous than tobacco
i am reading some articles that gives me a feeling of that asbestos is the strongest carcinogen other than tobbaco, is it true? are other substance like benzene more strong?
On 2023-10-07 by InspectApedia DF (mod) - Both tobacco and asbestos are hazardous substances - the dose determines the poison
@Anonymous,
It's unfortunately too easy to fall into a pit of fear of environmental hazards before we understand where we need the guardrails around those abysses.
I recommend reading HAZARD vs RISK - what's the difference
at
https://inspectapedia.com/hazmat/Hazard-vs-Risk.php
If we define "hazard" as something that is potentially dangerous
and
if we define "risk" as the chances of occurrence of actual bodily harm from the hazard or hazardous substance
then that article will help sort out your question.
Both tobacco and asbestos are hazardous substances.
But the dose makes the poison.
And while cautious government experts may correctly state that "no level of asbestos exposure is safe" it's most-likely that far more people are exposed to and may be affected by smoking than by exposure to asbestos.
By that measure, both substances are hazardous but the risk of tobacco smoke exposure - the chances of exposure and harm - are greater than the risk of asbestos exposure and harm.
Even clean water can be hazardous to your health if you drink enough of it at one time.
Asbestos was very hazardous at high levels of exposures, such as dockyard workers in the 1940s who moved and worked in air so thick with airborne asbestos that it was opaque, or for occupants of the World Trade Center tower collapse site where air was also thick was asbestos (and other harmful substances).
But far more people have smoked and been harmed by tobacco than the number exposed to and suffered illness from airborne asbestos.
According to the US CDC
... an estimated 28.3 million adults in the United States currently smoke cigarettes.2 More than 16 million Americans live with a smoking-related disease.
- source: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm#:~:text=This%20means%20an%20estimated%2028.3,with%20a%20smoking%2Drelated%20disease.
Compare that to this statement also from the US CDC about asbestos hazards and who is at risk:
Currently, the people most heavily exposed to asbestos in the United States are those in construction trades. This population includes an estimated 1.3 million construction workers as well as workers in building and equipment maintenance [American Thoracic Society 2004].
Because most asbestos was used in construction, and most asbestos produced is still used in this industry, risk to these workers can be considerable if the hazard is not recognized and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards are not enforced.
- source: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/asbestos/who_is_at_risk.html
Finally
If you truly want to have an informed, unbiased, intelligent exposure about hazards and risk, beware of making statements like yours that say "I heard somewhere" or "someone told me", or "some article said", and take care to cite your sources AND to read the expertise and credibility of your sources.
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.
On 2023-08-10 by Anonymous - Does a house built 1999 have asbestos?
does a house built 1999 have asbestos? i am considering for rent.
On 2023-08-10 by InspectApedia DF (mod) - not likely but ... age of building, specific product, and country location help determine presence of asbestos
@Anonymous,
The age of building and of the specific building product as well as country location all figure into a guess about whether or not it is likely to contain asbestos.
For example, in North America if asphalt or vinyl floor tiles or sheet flooring or ceiling tiles or drywall and joint compound were made or installed before 1986, treat the material as presumed to contain asbestos. So those items in your 1999 building would not have asbestos.
Please take a look at
IDENTIFY ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL - Easy steps to decide if a building product probably contains asbestos
and let us know if you have additional questions.For a list of asbestos laws, and bans and ban-dates by country see
ASBESTOS MATERIAL REGULATIONS https://inspectapedia.com/hazmat/Asbestos_Materials_Regs.php
On 2023-08-06 by Anonymous - asbestos at a refractdory door?
this is a refractory door, is this red tile contain asbestos? it feels soft touching on it.
is it even refractory tile for blockong smokes and fire for the seams?(additional question on the previous question with picture might not shown yet.)
nevermind, i thought the tile was the material but it was just dettached from the black refractory material inside the seam, so i don't think it is asbestos anymore.
this is the clearest view i can get, it was juat the tile dettached from the black refractory material. i have mistaken the tile itself was the refractory material. i don't think it is asbestos anymore.
[Ed. note: multiple questions from single reader were combined here]
On 2023-08-06 by InspectApedia Publisher
@Anonymous,
Please post a larger view so that we understand what we are looking at. That looks to me like vinyl embossed with a wood grain.
On 2023-07-22 by Anonymous - is encapsulated furnace pipe going to release any asbestos
is encapsulated furnace pipe going to release any asbestos in low levrl or release zero? the condition is quite new.
i read the article it says normslly brick and mortar wouldn't contain asbestos unless it is used on soecialized high heat environments. is that right?
On 2023-07-22 by InspectApedia Publisher - is encapsulated furnace pipe going to release any asbestos in low or zero level?
@Anonymous,
Properly-done, once asbestos piping has been encapsulated it is not releasing harmful levels of asbestos into building air and is probably not releasing detectable levels either.
There remains one caveat: if/when you have to have work done on the piping, such as repairing a leak or replacing a section of piping, extra care will be needed then as the workers will have to disturb the encapsulated insulation.
Otherwise, simply leave it alone.
On 2023-07-20 by ri - was asbestos used in mortar and bricks?
was asbestos used in mortar and bricks? also i heard that smoke amplifies asbestos exposure, so does occasional second hand smoke exposure also does the same on people with history of asbestos exposure?
On 2023-07-20 by InspectApedia DF (mod) - was asbestos used in mortar and bricks?
@ri,
Yes, asbestos has been used in bricks and mortar at times. Please see our article on this topic at
ASBESTOS USE IN BRICKS & MORTAR
You also mention “smoke amplifies asbestos exposure” which may be a bit misleading. Perhaps more accurately, one could say asbestos exposure for a smoker amplifies the health risk. I.e., whether one is a smoker or not doesn’t determine amount of asbestos exposure but rather the amount of exposure can affect a smoker in ways different than a non-smoker.
With regard to increased risk from asbestos exposure if you are a smoker, there are a number of factors that need to be considered. Level of exposure is just one factor. Please see this report
NON-OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO MINERAL FIBRES
Excerpts:
…workers who were cigarette smokers, exposure to asbestos dramatically increased the risk of lung cancer (Hammond et al., 1979x; McDonald, 1980).
…It is well established that asbestos exposure increases the already high risk that smokers run of contracting ling cancer (Selikoff et al., 1960. One hypothesis to explain this synergistic effect is that carcinogenic compounds in the cigarette smoke, in particular polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAIs), are adsorbed on the surfaces of the asbestos fibres. This may increase the retention of these substances in the lung and this also the risk of cancer developing (Harington, 1973).
See also
LUNG CANCER MORTALITY FROM EXPOSURE TO CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS & SMOKING
As far as second hand smoke and its relation to asbestos exposure, it may be similar to a non-smoker’s increased risk for lung cancer due to second hand smoke exposure. In our opinion, the condition of the lungs due to smoke exposure, intentional or not, can increase the potential damage from asbestos exposure although the risk may be less than that for a smoker. As we are not medical professionals, this is a good question to discuss with your doctor.
It is also worth noting that a history of asbestos exposure of sufficient duration, dose and latency can cause lung cancer, regardless of smoke exposure from any source.On 2023-07-20 by ri
@InspectApedia DF, alright i don't quite understand the part you said As far as second hand smoke and its relation to asbestos exposure, it may be similar to a non-smoker’s increased risk for lung cancer due to second hand smoke exposure. are you simply refering that the risk increase from second hand smoke exposure with asbestos exposure isn't much?
in a way that there is no synergistic effect like directly smoking
On 2023-07-20 by InspectApedia Publisher - does second hand smoke exposure affect people with history of asbestos exposure?
@ri,
Ample research, now over many years, has shown that smokers themselves as well as people who breathe second-hand smoke are at increased risks for cancers.
Anyone who has tar in their lungs (from cigarette smoke, for example) will, if they breathe in ANY harmful particle (asbestos, aspergillus spores, silica, etc.) will be at greater risk than those who do not.
Keep in mind that if nobody is grinding up your bricks or mortar, most likely there is no detectable indoor asbestos hazard from those non-friable materials.On 2023-07-21 by ri
@InspectApedia Publisher, does occasional second hand smoke exposure also do the sane? i read some articles says the lung usually recovers from short term exposure
On 2023-07-21 by InspectApedia DF (mod)
@ri,
As mentioned earlier, we are not medical professionals. You are encouraged to speak to your doctor about your concerns and questions.
On 2023-07-23 by Anonymous
@InspectApedia Publisher, i was told any level of asbestos is danger, not releasing detectable level, does it mean zero release?
i was just wondering since you said don't grind the brick and mortar, i thought you are referring to normal walls
what does it mean by not releasing harmful level or detectable level?
is encapsulated asbestos insulation on furnace pipe non-friable like mortar and brick? i found research about this kind of encapsulation would use sealant that penetartes to make sure it is tightly bound.
[Ed. note: multiple questions from single reader were combined here]
On 2023-07-22 by InspectApedia Publisher
@Anonymous,
Details that answer this question are at the article we cited for you earlier.
"Specialized" means exactly that, or to re-state, that means not in normal everyday construction of brick walls or walkways would we use asbestos-containing bricks or mortar.
Examples of "specialized" uses of bricks and mortar in high heat applications (fireplace liners, kilns, industrial processes) are cited in the article we recommend.
Please do take a look and let us know if that page needs clarification.On 2023-07-24 by InspectApedia Publisher - what does it mean by not releasing harmful level or detectable level?
@Anonymous,
The original asbestos pipe insulation often included friable materials, but once encapsulated it's not a concern as long as you leave it alone.
That's the purpose of and function of "encapsulation".
re your question
what does it mean by not releasing harmful level or detectable level?
I'm at a loss to explain further than the direct absolute meaning of those words.
"not releasing" - means nothing is being released
or
"harmful levels" - means levels that could be a health concern
or
"not detectable" and similar phrases are a safe choice of words to mean that IF any particles are being released they are not detectable - which should mean to you that the level of particles would be so infinitesimally small as to be of no interest.On 2023-07-24 by InspectApedia Publisher - Normal brick and mortar walls are not friable
@Anonymous,
Normal brick and mortar walls are not friable - don't release harmful dust by crumbling the material between a thumb and forefinger - and do not contain asbestos.On 2023-07-25 by Anonymous
@InspectApedia Publisher, sorry i was just a bit anxious, i mistaken your meaning of that it might still release small amount just not big enough to be detectable which still might posses risk if ihaling.
On 2023-07-25 by InspectApedia Publisher - Perspective on Environmental Hazards of "Non-Detectable levels of Airborne Asbestos"
@Anonymous,
We understand.
Perspective on Environmental Hazards of "Non-Detectable levels of Airborne Asbestos"
On one hand, experts say that there is no "safe" level of airborne asbestos.
On the other hand, a cautious, experienced person, reading the text of a generic inquiry like yours, without a shred of actual quantitative data, no site specifics, none of the details that an onsite expert would see, is not going to be so foolish as to promise you that there is no possible hazard from something about which you inquire.
Properly encapsulated asbestos suspect materials in a properly-cleaned site would not be expected to be producing detectable or hazardous levels of airborne asbestos.
So what's left. We think that most environmental experts would agree that if there is no detectable level of airborne asbestos in a building then there is no detectable hazard from that substance, and if there is no detectable hazard then there's nothing more useful to say about the risk.
Put another way, you are enormously more-likely to be hurt falling down stairs or die in an automobile accident or shot by a crazy person waving an automatic rifle about, than to be injured or die from an undetected level of airborne asbestos.
On 2023-07-26 by Anonymous
@InspectApedia Publisher, do you guys know if quitting smoke reduce the risk?
On 2023-07-26 by Anonymous
@InspectApedia DF, for the non-smokers increase risk of cancer are you referring to the article? abd what do you mean by any source of smoke, smokes from wood? in thr article does smoker means activly smokers for years? and for the low exposure group, does that mean they were exposed to low levels of asbestos for 24 years(average yrars of exposure in the article)?
On 2023-04-25 by Dusty - advice on cleaning up dust and debris that might be dangerous?
Before I clean this dust/debris up I wanted to ask if any risks or thoughts on origin of this dust/debris? It appears kind of gritty and looks like it may have trickled down between the floor boards from the main floor. (This is the basement in the pic).
A decent amount of this dust has settled onto HVAC vents and joists in the basement. Wondering what it might be and if any risks? (House is from late 50's Canada)
And a big collection of it right on top of the main HVAC vent, ideally would want to figure a way to contain and clean up without sending this throughout the house...any tipcs?
On 2023-04-25 by Dusty
Close up of the texture of it
On 2023-04-25 by InspectApedia Publisher (mod) - how to clean vermiculite insulation debris
@Dusty,
That looks like vermiculite insulation, a material that often contains asbestos.
Proper cleaning would include damp wiping and HEPA vacuuming.
On 2023-03-01 by Hannah - can you identify this insulation as asbestos? (ceiling tile)
I was wondering if it’s possible to visually identify this yellow pipe insulation as asbestos insulation or not.
It doesn’t look like the asbestos insulation I’ve seen on this site, more like fiberglass, but I wanted to make sure and the building manager had not gotten back to me yet. Thank you.
On 2023-03-01 by InspectApedia Editor
@Hannah,
That looks like fiberglass insulation.
On 2023-02-14 by Karole - does this fiberboard contain asbestos?
Hi , I have a ceiling which we placed plasterboard over ... i ve always thought it was old hard board panels . The cottage is really old and I suspect that ceiling is well before 1970 . I know our other ceilings are plaster board , replaced in 1998 and no one has ever mentioned asbestos .
Our new neighbours recently found old hidden asbestos in a ceiling . I wondered if it is possible to tell by the pictures if there could be asbestos in these panels ?
On 2023-02-14 by InspectApedia Editor - asbestos in fiberboard panels?
@Karole,
Are you able to see any markings or labels on the panels? This would help in determining an answer. It looks like a wood fiber based board.
Keep in mind that in its current state, even if it were asbestos containing material, it's not friable or creating dust and therefore has minimal risk.
See more of our discussion on this topic at
ASBESTOS IN FIBERBOARD BUILDING SHEATHING & INSULATING BOARD
...
Continue reading at ASBESTOS PHOTO GUIDE to MATERIALS or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.
Or see ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION IN BUILDINGS FAQs - questions & answers about how to recognize asbestos - posted originally at this page
Or see these
ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION IN BUILDINGS at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.
Or see this
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website
Note: appearance of your Comment below may be delayed: if your comment contains an image, photograph, web link, or text that looks to the software as if it might be a web link, your posting will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. Apologies for the delay.
Only one image can be added per comment but you can post as many comments, and therefore images, as you like.
You will not receive a notification when a response to your question has been posted.
Please bookmark this page to make it easy for you to check back for our response.
Our Comment Box is provided by Countable Web Productions countable.ca
In addition to any citations in the article above, a full list is available on request.
Albania Deleon was convicted in November 2008 in Massachusetts on environmental and other charges related to a fraudulent asbestos training institute she ran there. She fled the state in March 2009, two days before her sentencing.
Carrying a false identity card and having dyed her hair blond, she was arrested Saturday when Dominican agents pulled over her vehicle in Santo Domingo. The State Department had submitted an extradition request to the Dominican Republic after realizing she had left the country.