This article explains the difference between an environmental hazard and actual risk levels to building occupants from such hazards.
Making this less-than-obvious distinction between hazard and risk can help us decide when and how to spend money managing or addressing environmental and other hazards found in, on, and around buildings and their mechanical systems.
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.
- Daniel Friedman, Publisher/Editor/Author - See WHO ARE WE?
Across many building, mechanical, structural, and environmental hazards discussed in articles found at InspectApedia.com, the most common concerns expressed by our readers are
Safety, environmental and health experts have for some time made an important distinction between hazard and risk that, until it has been explained, is not obvious to the rest of us.
Photo: we found these drums used to store toxic chemicals at the site of a home inspection in New York.
[Click to enlarge any image]
If a substance or building condition is called a hazard, that simply means that there is a potential for harm.
For example, experts have said that asbestos is a hazardous material and a potential carcinogen.
But that statement doesn't tell us anything about the specific level of actual risk of harm at a specific building where asbestos might be present.
Unlike hazards just mentioned above, some safety and health experts refer to risk as the probability of and severity of harm (to building occupants or perhaps to the building itself, depending on what issue is being discussed).
In a discussion of the relationship between food safety and health, Clemens et al (2016) put it this way:
... it is important to remember a simple acronym, RITE (Risk Is Toxicity x Exposure)
The authors point out that some things that people are very worried about actually produce no plausible risk [we add that] while others can be very high risk and deserve prompt action.
An example is found in U.S. EPA and other authorities' advice about non-friable asbestos materials. Although asbestos is hazardous, asbestos materials that are not shedding or releasing asbestos dust into the occupied space and that are being left undisturbed are hazardous but do not present a meaningful risk to building occupants.
We'd add that other concerns we may find at, in, or on a building might pose a very high risk even if they're not the first thing that catches our attention.
For example, falling down the stairs is one of the most common hazards in buildings.
Clearly we don't have an endless supply of money, time, and attention, and because we need to make rational decisions about when to expend those on addressing a concern at a building, it is essential to consider risk, not just hazard.
If we fail to consider risk, we can spend enormous amounts of time and money on the wrong problem at buildings.
As we summarized above, health and environmental professionals point out that in assessing the actual risk of harm from a hazardous material such as an environmental contaminant or unsafe building material (asbestos, lead paint, pesticides, etc.) the actual risk depends on
But for many building materials or conditions that involve hazardous materials or substances as well as risk of health or economic harm, we can make a simpler analysis: how serious is this problem, what sorts of harm are involved, and how urgently should we act?
Above: a reader's measurement of magnetic field strength.
A home buyer was extremely worried about and planned to spend a significant sum investigating whether or not the electromagnetic fields from overhead power lines a mile away were going to cause injury to the home occupants.
The strength of EMF falls off as the square of the distance, so his EMF measurement "under the power line" did not give a useful indication of the risk closer to his home.
Yet he was so frightened that he was planning to install expensive (and ineffective) EMF shielding around the home.
But during the inspection we found stairs that had tall, rotting, uneven stair treads along a stairway with no handrails, an FPE electrical panel whose circuit breakers are known to fail to protect from fire and over-current at a significant rate, an unsafe chimney venting heating furnace that was back-drafting flue gases and potentially fatal carbon monoxide into the home, and a return air inlet right at the furnace, and several more immediate functional and safety concerns.
Our opinion was that even before considering the vulnerability of the building occupants or the duration of their exposure, the risks from those findings were far greater than the distant overhead electrical power lines.
See BACKDRAFTING HEATING EQUIPMENT
and compare those hazards to
EMF CANCER RISK from distant power lines.
The top three leading causes of preventable injury-related death – poisoning, motor vehicle, and falls – account for over 86% of all preventable deaths. No other preventable cause of death—including suffocation, drowning, fires and burns, and natural or environmental disasters—accounts for more than 5% of the total. - U.S. National Safety Council, To 10 Preventable Injuries (2023)
Similarly, The U.S. CDC, reporting on Top Ten Leading Causes of Death in the U.S. for Ages 1-44 from 1981-2020 notes that
At ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATION a reader asked:
Is a small hairline dent worrisome on a asbestos plaster on pipe? - Anonymous 2023/09/01
We replied:
If your "small hairline dent" is the same as my idea of that sort of damage, my answer would be no.
Put another way, if asbestos- or asbestos-suspect pipe insulation is undamaged, that is, it's not shedding insulating material, then it's not releasing a meaningful enough amount of material to be considered a risk, even though asbestos itself is a hazardous material.
In contrast, the asbestos pipe insulation in the photo below is a hazard. Anyone who has to work in this space, say repairing a leaky pipe, faces a significant asbestos exposure risk because it's so difficult to move in the area without disturbing this friable material.
And there is additional risk that workers or building occupants track this friable asbestos insulation into the occupied spaces of the building as well.
...
Continue reading at FEAR-O-METER: Dan's 3 D's SET REPAIR PRIORITIES, or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.
Or see these
HAZARD vs RISK at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.
Or see this
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website
Note: appearance of your Comment below may be delayed: if your comment contains an image, photograph, web link, or text that looks to the software as if it might be a web link, your posting will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. Apologies for the delay.
Only one image can be added per comment but you can post as many comments, and therefore images, as you like.
You will not receive a notification when a response to your question has been posted.
Please bookmark this page to make it easy for you to check back for our response.
IF above you see "Comment Form is loading comments..." then COMMENT BOX - countable.ca / bawkbox.com IS NOT WORKING.
In any case you are welcome to send an email directly to us at InspectApedia.com at editor@inspectApedia.com
We'll reply to you directly. Please help us help you by noting, in your email, the URL of the InspectApedia page where you wanted to comment.
In addition to any citations in the article above, a full list is available on request.