Zinsco Circuit Breaker Failure Test Report
This article provides the result of testing to-date of Zinsco brand circuit breakers and results of a very small sampling of UBI-brand replacement circuit breakers for Zinsco type electrical panels. Testing of 111 Zinsco-Type circuit breakers to date has found high failure rates.
Page top photograph: arcing burns on the buss connector clips in a single-pole 50-A Zinsco circuit breaker, courtesy of Jess Aronstein.
This article series describes the identification, hazards, reliability & field failure reports of Zinsco or Sylvania-Zinsco or Kearney electrical panels: overheating, failure to trip, fires, other defects.
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.
- Daniel Friedman, Publisher/Editor/Author - See WHO ARE WE?
Dr. Jess Aronstein, an independent forensic testing engineer has tested samples of Zinsco and UBI-Zinsco circuit breakers retrieved from in-use electrical panels from several locations in the United States. As of 2017 the Zinsco type circuit breaker test number was 111 breakers and included four of UBI Zinsco breakers.
Test results applying the UL-489 requirement for the breaker to trip at 135% of rated current found 32 failures out of 111 Zinsco breakers, including two that jammed (no trip at >200% of current rating). That's a 28.8% failure rate for the test group.
We (Friedman & Aronstein) think that across the electrical industry for residential circuit breakers, the typical failure-to-trip rate for these devices is less than 1%.
[Click to enlarge any image]
Dr. Aronstein has also tested 4 UBI Zinsco type replacement breakers. All 4 of the UBI Zinsco replacement circuit breakers failed the UL 489 requirement to trip at 135% of rated current, a 100% failure rate - including one jam.
The circuit breakers included units rated at 15A, 20A, 30A, 40A, and 50A, and further included both single pole and double-pole breakers.
Illustrated here: a screen shot of Aronstein's test results showing the applied test load in current (Amps) on the vertical axis and elapsed time until the breaker trips on the horizontal axis.
For the breaker illustrated here, #r 15-5 in the table below, after two hours of total test time including one hour at 135% of rated current, the Zinsco circuit breaker had not tripped.
Table I Summary of Zinsco & UBI-Brand Zinsco Replacement Circuit Breaker Failure Test Results |
||
Summary: tests to 20 March 2017 |
||
Number Tested n=1111 | Failure Percent | |
Total # Zinsco-Type Circuit Breakers Tested ( Zinsco + UBI-ZInsco) | 111 | |
Breakers Failing to Meet UL 135% Trip Requirement | 32 | 28.8% |
Critical Safety Failures (no trip @ 200%) Subset of the 135% no-trip total | 2* | 1.8% |
* Subset of the 135% no-trip total | ||
Zinsco Brand Circuit Breaker Tests | Number Tested | Failure Percent |
Total # Zinsco Brand Circuit Breakers Tested | 1071 | |
Breakers Failing to Meet UL 135% Trip Requirement | 28 | 26.2% |
Critical Safety Failures (no trip @ 200%) * Subset of the 135% no-trip total |
1* | 0.9 % |
UBI - Zinsco Circuit Breaker Tests | ||
Total # Double Pole UBI Breakers Tested | 41 | |
Breakers Failing to Meet UL 135% Trip Requirement | 4 | 100.0% |
Critical Safety Failures (no trip @ 200%) * Subset of the 135% no-trip total |
1* | 25.0% |
Data as of 20 March 2017, by private email, J. Aronstein to D. Friedman et als.
The table below shows the test results for an example subset of 14 Zinsco-brand circuit breakers submitted to Jess Aronstein by Thomas D'Agostino (cited below).
These breakers are a proper subset of the 98 Zinsco-brand circuit breakers tested to date. Overall test results and failure percentage for 98 Zinsco and 3 UBI-Zinsco-replacement breakers tested to date were give just above.
Table II Example Zinsco Circuit Breaker Failure Test Results1 |
|||
Breaker ID & Ampacity | Breaker Type: Poles |
Test Result | Comments |
15-1 | Single pole | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | |
15-2 | Single pole | OK, tripped at 02:51 (mm:ss) @135% of rated current | |
15-3 | Single pole | OK, tripped at 10:19 @135% of rated current | |
15-4 | Double - Pole A | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | In proper two-pole circuit breaker operation, if one pole trips the breaker should force both poles to trip to the "OFF" Position - Ed. |
Double - Pole B | OK, tripped at 05:49 @135% of rated current | ||
15-5 | Double - Pole A | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | This was the worst-case failure of the lot - see screen shot above. |
Double - Pole B | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | ||
20-1 | Single pole | OK, tripped at 10:12 @135% of rated current | |
20-2 | Single pole | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | |
20-3 | Double - Pole A | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | |
Double - Pole B | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | ||
20-4 | Double - Pole A | OK, tripped at 13:04 @135% of rated current | |
Double - Pole B | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | ||
30-1 | Double - Pole A | OK, tripped at 02:21 @135% of rated current | |
Double - Pole B | OK, tripped at 01:28 @135% of rated current | ||
40-1 | Double - Pole A | OK, tripped at 16:46 @135% of rated current | |
Double - Pole B | OK, tripped at 08:20 @135% of rated current | ||
40-2 | Double - Pole A | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | |
Double - Pole B | Failed - No trip >1 Hr @135% of rated current | ||
50-1 | Single pole | OK, tripped at 4:20 @135% of rated current | Had been arcing at the busbar contact - see photo at the top of this page |
50-2 | Single pole | OK, tripped at 8:51 @135% of rated current |
Data in the table above provides details of individucal Zinsco type breaker tests and represents earlire data: In this table data is of 18 December 2016 when Dr. Aronstein had tested 98 Zinsco brand circuit breakers from different sources.
1. The table illustrates example rest results for a subset of 21 circuit breakers all from the same building complex.
2. See the circuit breaker test criteria and test consultant citations provided in the article below.
Watch out: while a visual inspection of circuit breakers might spot evidence of corrosion, overheating, or physical damage rendering those breakers unsafe and unreliable, the more-complete and UL-standard-compliant circuit breaker testing conducted by Dr. Aronstein requires a specialized electrical test lab. This is beyond the scope of a licensed electrician.
Visually inspecting or toggling the breakers will not detect this type of fault.
DO NOT attempt to test circuit breakers in-place by overloading them. That approach risks fire or injury.
For purposes of these tests, "Failure" means that the circuit breaker failed to trip within one hour of submitting the circuit breaker to an overload of 135% of rated current. These failures occurred on (nn) single pole breakers and on at least one pole of (nn) two-pole circuit breakers.
The test current applied for this study is defined by the applicable UL standard, and the failure criterion being used is that of the UL standard that requires these breaker to trip within 1 hour at 135% of rated current.
Throughout this article series about Zinsco-brand circuit breaker reliability and safety we have asked readers to contribute for independent testing used, replacement, or new Zinsco-brand or UBI-brand replacement circuit breakers intended for use in Zinsco-brand electrical panels.
Previously at ZINSCO FAILURE REPORTS we reported visual observation of significant Zinsco breaker damage in about 25% of the Zinsco/Sylvania panels that were checked.
InspectAPedia is an independent publisher of building, environmental, and forensic inspection, diagnosis, and repair information provided free to the public - we have no business nor financial connection with any manufacturer or service provider discussed at our website. We do not sell products nor services.
We are dedicated to making our information as accurate, complete, useful, and unbiased as possible: we very much welcome critique, questions, or content suggestions for our web articles.
...
Continue reading at ZINSCO SYLVANIA KEARNEY FAILURE REPORTS - field failure reports of Zinsco type circuit breakers, or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.
Or see
ZINSCO CIRCUIT BREAKER TEST REPORT at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.
Or see this
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Questions & answers or comments about how to identify Kearney electrical panels & other Zinsco look-alikes. .
Try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website
Note: appearance of your Comment below may be delayed: if your comment contains an image, photograph, web link, or text that looks to the software as if it might be a web link, your posting will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. Apologies for the delay.
Only one image can be added per comment but you can post as many comments, and therefore images, as you like.
You will not receive a notification when a response to your question has been posted.
Please bookmark this page to make it easy for you to check back for our response.
Our Comment Box is provided by Countable Web Productions countable.ca
In addition to any citations in the article above, a full list is available on request.