Building Inspection, Diagnosis & Repair Info

Photograph of Moldy visible growing on a fiberglass insulation fiber  © Daniel FriedmanTest Choices to Screen for Mold in Fiberglass in Insulation

  • POST a QUESTION or COMMENT about methods for testing for the presence of mold contaminants in fiberglass or other building insulation products

Fiberglass insulation mold contamination test details:

This document discusses choices of test methods to screen for toxic or allergenic mold contamination in fiberglass building insulation in residential and light-commercial buildings.

Mold is often found in basement fiberglass insulation, crawl space fiberglass insulation, fiberglass wall insulation, heating or cooling duct fiberglass insulation, and attic or roof insulation in buildings which have either been wet or have been exposed to high levels of mold from other sources.

InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.

- Daniel Friedman, Publisher/Editor/Author - See WHO ARE WE?





ADVERTISEMENT





How to Test Building Insulation for Mold Contamination

Fiberglass testing (C) Daniel Friedman

This article explains how to find or test for moldy insulation in buildings, the probable cause of mold contamination in building insulation, and how to recognize conditions that make that problem likely in a particular case.

Our page top photo shows a Burkard personal air sampler that with clever manipulation can be used to test fiberglass building insulation for contaminating particles including mold, insect fragments, pollen, or other debris.

This website discusses health hazards associated with moldy fiberglass in buildings, with focus on fiberglass insulation, fiberglass fragments, fiberglass in heating and air conditioning duct work, and invisible but toxic mold growth in fiberglass which has been wet, exposed to high humidity, or exposed to other moldy conditions.

Watch out: Our photo of clean-looking insulation in a basement ceiling (at below left left) does not provide evidence that insulation testing was necessary for that building.

But a case history of occupant complaints, a wet basement, and previous storage of moldy materials in the basement that had been removed at the time of our inspection led us to test and confirm that this insulation was severely contaminated with Penicillium sp. mold.

Reader Question: How should we sample fiberglass insulation for mold when investigating a building?

Photograph moldy fiberglass insulation in a basement - it looked clean but it was not - © Daniel Friedman

I believe that there is mold that is not visible to the eye, but how do you confirm that it is there? Send a piece of the insulation to a lab for analysis? I’m a mold inspector in Minneapolis, Minnesota and we have a lot of damp insulation in basements here.

Sometimes I see spots on the insulation and know that there is obvious mold, but I have long suspected (based on smell and moisture readings) that some mold might not be visible to the eye. Is it just that it is in early growth stage so the colonies are too small to see?

And again, how do you verify that this is the case – by samples submitted to the lab? I was on the site searching for information on mold in insulated ducts. - Vickie Swenson, CRMI Minnesota Mold Inspection (612) 508-2742

Answer: Detailed Description of Methods for Testing Building Insulation for Mold

Fiberglass testing (C) Daniel FriedmanYou are quite right that it can be impossible to see mold in some materials including fiberglass insulation. Sometimes fiberglass looks very very clean to the naked eye, but is chock full of Aspergillus or Penicillium.

There are several similar ways to test insulation that does not already give visual evidence of a mold problem.

Air Sampling Cassettes for Insulation Mold Test

We use an air sampling cassette such as an Air-o-Cel or Allergenco unit with a vacuum pump set to move air at the proper flow rate for the cassette (typically 10 lpm). The sampler is held 1-4 inches away from the insulation and then with the pump running we poke or agitate the suspect insulation to stir a particle release.

The sample interval needs to be short - often just 5-20 seconds in duration since otherwise you risk overloading the cassette with fiberglass particles.

At ACCURACY OF AIR TESTS for MOLD we include photos of particle traces on microscope slides that can help you recognize when a dust sample is overloaded and thus hard to analyze in the lab.

Our photo (above left) shows a more complicated version of this test about to start. In this case we were using two air sampling pumps and two different brands of sampling cassettes in order to compare their behavior during dust sampling.

In the foreground you can just make out a special timer-switch that we used to turn on and off both pumps simultaneously.

If you are in doubt or inexperienced, try making three sample cassettes of 5, 10, and 20 second durations, agitating the insulation about the same degree in each case and keeping about the same distance.

The time and distance are not critical as long as we make clear that this is a qualitative test for the presence or absence of high levels of mold or other particles in the insulation, not a quantitative test.

Burkard Personal Air Sampler and Prepared Slide for Insulation Mold Test

A second method for testing fiberglass insulation that we have used with good results was to run a Burkard personal air sampler with a prepared collection slide mounted in the device for a 15-second interval, holding the sampler one to six inches away from the insulation during agitation of the insulation itself.

You can simply use a pencil to poke the insulation during sampling. As with the air sampling cassette approach above, make several test samples at different sampling durations to be sure you have a good sample that is not overloaded.

Alternative, low-cost Air Pumps for Building Insulation Mold Testing

Simple keyboard vacuum used as a building dust collection pump (C) Daniel FriedmanWhile we prefer using a calibrated instrument for pulling particles from building insulation to screen for mold contamination, considering that a reasonable mold contamination test is qualitative and that precise mold counts are inappropriate (and would be misleading), as long as your air pump or vacuum device produces a flow-rate within the operating range of your sampling cassette or slide, you can use less costly devices such as the keyboard vacuum pump shown here.

Watch out: the airflow rate of portable battery operated pumps such as shown here varies widely from device to device as well as depending on battery condition.

For field use in testing insulation, we tested ten low-cost portable pumps in our forensic laboratory, selecting a subset that consistently delivered 10-15 LPM with fresh batteries .

Constructing a Clean Test Chamber to Screen Insulation for Mold

In the laboratory, if we receive a bulk sample of suspect insulation, in addition to inspecting the insulation itself in the stereo microscope and high power transmitted light forensic microscope, we sometimes use a third sampling method that is most suitable for a variety of suspect, perhaps dirty and loose materials.

We construct a test chamber using a cardboard box lined with a new clean plastic garbage bag.

The bag lines the box, the sample is placed into the box, the box is sealed. We cut an opening sufficient to admit or affix our air sampling cassette, then we agitate the box for 30 seconds before pulling a vacuum sample from the box itself.

This method also can reduce overloading the sample with fiberglass particles.

Quantitative Analysis of Insulation Samples for Mold Contamination

It is possible to perform quantitative analysis of insulation or other fibrous materials or dust samples for mold contamination using a wash and filter method that collects most particles from the insulation sample into a liquid for further processing and particle counting.

We do not agree that the apparent accuracy of this method is real, and we suspect that except for controlled technical studies it is not appropriate.

  1. Fungal contamination within a fiberglass sample varies widely even within the same building area depending on proximity to a leak
  2. Fungal contamination within fiberglass insulation in a building varies by distance to an external airborne mold source such as moldy contents stored in a basement below a fiberglass-insulated ceiling
  3. Fungal contamination in fiberglass insulation in a building will vary by other factors such as insulation age, density, installation details, presence or absence of vapor barriers, air movement patterns, etc.

Therefore a quantitative analysis of mold spores per cubic inch, meter or other volume of fiberglass insulation may be very precise (lots of decimal places) but inaccurate as an estimator of size of the problem mold reservoir.

Should All Building Insulation be Tested for Mold?

No.

We do not recommend testing all insulation for mold.

The decision to test insulation for mold needs to be made based on a careful building inspection and case history, including visual evidence of leaks or the presence of exposed fiberglass over an area known to be or have been subject to a large mold contamination problem or a mold remediation project.

...




ADVERTISEMENT





Reader Comments, Questions & Answers About The Article Above

Below you will find questions and answers previously posted on this page at its page bottom reader comment box.

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs

Some of our ceiling fiberglass insulation is moisture stained: is it likely to be moldy?

The fiberglass insulation on the ceiling has some mostly small ( 1 inch by 1 to 3 inches) moisture stains. But there are quite a few sections along the ceiling that i can easily access that have this problem ( probably once on section from roof apex to eaves). How likely is it that it is contaminated by mold? On 2021-06-27 by Holly

Answer by inspectapedia.com.moderator (mod) - check for mold growth on the wall cavity side of drywall that got wet

@Holly,

Drywall is very mold friendly; it would make sense to inspect the hidden side of drywall that

1. has been wet

2. remained wet for 24 hours or longer

and if you find mold on the attic side of ceiling drywall I'd treat that insulation above-it as presumed mold-contaminated too

by Holly

@inspectapedia.com.moderator, there is no drywall on the ceiling. it has the insulation exposed with plastic sheeting underneath.

by inspectapedia.com.moderator (mod)

@Holly

Okay so if I understand you correctly you are seeing moisture on the ceiling or insulation side of the plastic barrier. That tells you that there has already been a problem with either weeks or condensation. Most experts agree that insulation that's been wet should be removed and replaced. I don't think that changing the ventilation system was changed that condition

by Holly

@inspectapedia.com.moderator, Thanks. I agree it is probably from a leak. OK,. so even though somewhat low amount of moisture penetration, still probably best to discard of insulation?

by inspectapedia.com.moderator (mod)

@Holly

IMO replacing suspect insulation is so inexpensive, especially where it's readily accessible, that leaving it in place is not worth the much greater cost of having to do the job over again later because of a mold or other contamination issue.


Kitchen leak leads to mold-contaminated fiberglass insulation

Hi, We purchased our home in 2012, The main part of the home is built in 1940, and the additions were done in 1994.

We had a water leak in the kitchen. We replaced or sistered the joists. Replaced the flooring.

Our bedroom was the next place to do. My husband kept getting sick with respiratory things. I was on oxygen for awhile, then went to a CPAP. But always felt tired, and just not right.

My husband would get up and be coughing and blowing his nose like crazy. I then got to the point that my nose would be itching like crazy.

We had a cold return vent under my bed, that we covered in a clean bag. As there was only a crawl space under the original part of the house. when they added a new living room and 2nd bedroom, they put in a basement. We pulled up the floors in the bedroom. Carpet, newspaper, hardwood floor, then slats of hardwood flooring, that was from the 1910 fire that went through here in Baudette, MN.

It was burnt on one side. Now we are at the joists. Along the wall there is styrene, some concrete for footing and or hard thick wood for foundation. We pulled up the styrene, and it reeked of mold and moisture. There is also fiberglass stuck in here too. This fiberglass changed colors. I wear a mask when I go in there, otherwise I start sneezing.

I have read your articles, how would I go about sending any of this to make sure we know what we have and how to clean it. My husband has a severe nasal infection. We have a north wall that does not get any sun, and is always wet on the outside. Nothing grows there, but moss. On this north wall up into the wall we think it is blown insulation as it just goes to a fine powder and is an off white, in color.

We can see holes in the wood to the outside too. We want to seal all of this crawl space up. There is a fine white powder on the black dirt, in this space also. We now sleep in the garage, that is being turned into a living room, on a slab of concrete. We are way up north next to Canada. It is snowing today. So it is cold a lot.

But you can see the moisture on the dirt inside the wall foundation. Any and all help will be appreciated. sorry can't spell either. Sincerely, Mary Ann Benson 205 5th Avenue SE, Baudette, MN 56623. Do you know if insurance will pay for any of this too? Thank you

PS I love your site, and I gave my doctor some of your articles too, as there are others with old homes too. And no I didn't have a Asthma attack either. Thank you On 2016-03-25 by Mary Ann Benson

Reply by Mod - here's where I'd start to address your concerns

Mary Ann

I would start by reviewing your concerns with your doctor. If knowing more about what's in the dust, air, insulation, and on surfaces in your crawl/now/basement (or other house areas) would be useful to the doc it may be worth hiring a professional to inspect, identify problem reservoirs, and collect a few samples for characterization. (See the EXPERTS DIRECTORY at the top of any InspectApedia page. )

Insulation (fiberglass) that changes color may simply be different brands, different ages, or it may be dirty from air movement or other sources.

"Blown insulation" that goes to a fine white powder when touched is often old UFFI - the out gas hazard would be over by now but you may find that this insulation has shrunk, leaving air leaks and heat loss around the perimeter of the wall bays sprayed with this material.

Basically you want to identify problem reservoirs of dust, dirt, mold, or other substances, remove them, and in the case of leak-related problems such as mold, find and fix the cause.

About insurance coverage: many homeowners insurance policies will include building cleaning and repair, including mold removal, for mold caused by a category of leak that is included in the insurance coverage while other water sources and leaks will be excluded.

PS: I just returned to NY from the north shore of Lake Superior - I know it's plenty chilly in Baudette.


...

Continue reading at TEST PROCEDURE for MOLD in FIBERGLASS about just how fiberglass mold tests are conducted in the field or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.

Or see these

Recommended Articles

Suggested citation for this web page

TEST CHOICES for MOLD in FIBERGLASS at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.

Or see this

INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES: ARTICLE INDEX to MOLD CONTAMINATION & REMEDIATION

Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Share this article:

Questions & answers or comments about methods for testing for the presence of mold contaminants in fiberglass or other building insulation products.

Search the InspectApedia website

Need to make a private comment? Email editor@inspectApedia.com. We welcome email with your website content critique, corrections, suggestions or questions. Email is monitored daily but our workload may prevent an immediate reply. For immediate results, we hope you'll first try asking your question using the search box just above.

Citations & Reviewers

In addition to any citations in the article above, a full list is available on request.

  • Fiberglass carcinogenicity: Glass Wool Fibers Expert Panel Report, Part B - Recommendation for Listing Status for Glass Wool Fibers and Scientific Justification for the Recommendation", The Report on Carcinogens (RoC) expert panel for glass wool fibers exposures met at the Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel, Chapel Hill, North Carolina on June 9-10, 2009, to peer review the draft background document on glass wool fibers exposures and make a recommendation for listing status in the 12th Edition of the RoC.

    The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences is one of the National Institutes of Health within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The National Toxicology Program is headquartered on the NIEHS campus in Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Fiberglass insulation mold: occurrence of mold contamination in fiberglass insulation can be impossible to see with the naked eye, but can be significant
  • [4] Thanks to reader Vickie Swenson, CRMI, Minnesota Mold Inspection (612) 508-2742, for discussing methods for sampling fiberglass insulation for mold contamination, June 2010 . Ms Swenson can be contacted by email to eagletree@frontier.com
  • [5] Ahearn, D.G., S A Crow, R B Simmons, D L Price, J A Noble, S K Mishra and D L Pierson, "Fungal colonization of fiberglass insulation in the air distribution system of a multi-story office building: VOC production and possible relationship to a sick building syndrome", Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Volume 16, Number 5 (1996), 280-285, DOI: 10.1007/BF01570035. Abstract:

    Complaints characteristic of those for sick building syndrome prompted mycological investigations of a modern multi-story office building on the Gulf coast in the Southeastern United States (Houston-Galveston area).

    The air handling units and fiberglass duct liner of the heating, ventilating and air conditioning system of the building, without a history of catastrophic or chronic water damage, demonstrated extensive colonization with Penicillium spp and Cladosporium herbarum.

    Although dense fungal growth was observed on surfaces within the heating-cooling system, most air samples yielded fewer than 200 CFU m–3. Several volatile compounds found in the building air were released also from colonized fiberglass.

    Removal of colonized insulation from the floor receiving the majority of complaints of mouldy air and continuous operation of the units supplying this floor resulted in a reduction in the number of complaints.
  • [6] Ahearn, D.G., S.A. Crow, R.B. Simmons, D.L. Price, S.K. Mishra and D.L. Pierson, "Fungal Colonization of Air Filters and Insulation in a Multi-Story Office Building: Production of Volatile Organics", Current Microbiology Volume 35, Number 5 (1997), 305-308, DOI: 10.1007/s002849900259, Abstract:

    Secondary air filters in the air-handling units on four floors of a multi-story office building with a history of fungal colonization of insulation within the air distribution system were examined for the presence of growing fungi and production of volatile organic compounds.

    Fungal mycelium and conidia of Cladosporium and Penicillium spp. were observed on insulation from all floors and both sides of the air filters from one floor.

    Lower concentrations of volatile organics were released from air filter medium colonized with fungi as compared with noncolonized filter medium. However, the volatiles from the colonized filter medium included fungal metabolites such as acetone and a carbonyl sulfide-like compound that were not released from noncolonized filter medium. The growth of fungi in air distribution systems may affect the content of volatile organics in indoor air.
  • [7] Price,D. L., R. B. Simmons, I. M. Ezeonu, S. A. Crow and D. G. Ahearn, "Colonization of fiberglass insulation used in heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems", Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology Volume 13, Number 3 (1994), 154-158, DOI: 10.1007/BF01584000, Abstract:

    The number of fungal species colonizing thermal and acoustic fiberglass insulations used in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems was fewer than that obtained from initial direct culture of these insulations.

    The colonization, determined by the microscopic observation of conidiophores with conidia, was primarily of acrylic-latex-facing material, but eventually the fungi permeated the fiberglass matrix. Isolates of Aspergillus versicolor were most often obtained from non-challenged insulation, whereasAcremonium obclavatum appeared to be the primary colonizing fungus in high-humidity (>90%) challenge chambers.

    At a lower humidity (about 70%) Aspergillus flavus was one of the more prominent fungi. Not all duct liner samples were equally susceptible to colonization and duct board appeared relatively resistant to colonization.
  • [8] Simmons, R. B. and S. A. Crow, "Fungal colonization of air filters for use in heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems", Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology Volume 14, Number 1 (1995), 41-45, DOI: 10.1007/BF01570065, Abstract:

    New and used cellulosic air filters for HVAC systems including those treated with antimicrobials were suspended in vessels with a range of relative humidities (55–99%) and containing non-sterile potting soil which stimulates fungal growth. Most filters yielded fungi prior to suspension in the chambers but only two of 14 nontreated filters demonstrated fungal colonization following use in HVAC systems.

    Filters treated with antimicrobials, particularly a phosphated amine complex, demonstrated markedly less fungal colonization than nontreated filters. In comparison with nontreated cellulosic filters, fungal colonization of antimicrobial-treated cellulosic filters was selective and delayed.
  • [9] Ifeoma M. Ezeonu, Daniel L. Price, Sidney A. Crow and Donald G. Ahearn, "Effects of extracts of fiberglass insulations on the growth of Aspergillus fumigatus and A. versicolor", Mycopathologia Volume 132, Number 2 (1995), 65-69, DOI: 10.1007/BF01103777 , Abstract:

    Water extracts of thermal and acoustic fiberglass insulations used in the duct work of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems supported germination of conidia and growth of Aspergillus versicolor (Vuillemin) Tiraboschi 1908–9 and Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius 1863. Urea, formaldehyde and unidentified organics were detected in the extracts.

    Formaldehyde in concentrations similar to those found in the extracts restricted the growth of both species in enriched media. A. versicolor, the more common species associated with fiberglass insulations, was more resistant to formaldehyde than A. fumigatus.


ADVERTISEMENT