Types of Test Cuts into Building Ceilings, Floors, Walls or for Bulk Sample Collection for Laboratory Analysis:
This article describes approaches to making test cuts into building surfaces to inspect for hidden contaminants, to collect bulk samples for asbestos or mold testing, and for diagnosis of building leaks, odors, environmental hazards, or other problems that may require invasive inspection methods or bulk sample collection for laboratory analysis.
The fact that asbestos, mold or other hazardous building contaminants are "hidden" in buildings does not mean one cannot find it. We look by context: where do we see leak stains, or where do we see building practices most likely to have produced a hidden leak or moisture problem? Ice dam leaks in walls, hidden plumbing leaks, roof spillage by the foundation, are all common clues that often track to a wet building wall or ceiling cavity and from there to a hidden mold problem which may need to be addressed.
Green links show where you are. © Copyright 2017 InspectApedia.com, All Rights Reserved.
The photo shows us cutting a round hole in a wall to expose the wall cavity. We cut high enough above the floor to avoid the sill plate and to give access to the wall cavity itself. We cut close to but not on top of a wall stud, so that when examining the wall cavity we can examine:
Do not fail to check all of these surfaces. It is common to find more severe mold growth on the drywall of one side of a wall cavity than on the other. This happens when water has run down one surface but not on another. The wall cavity side of our drywall test plug shows black and red mold and yeast contamination that was thick over the drywall surface even though the room-side of this drywall looked perfectly clean.
Watch out: if you suspect the presence of hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead, or chemical contaminants, use dust-control methods such as wetting and HEPA vacuuming as well as appropriate personal protective gear, and choose the sampling method that will produce the least amount of airborne dust and debris.
When cutting a test opening to explore a wood floor installed on sleepers over a concrete slab, we use two diameters of hole saws (see photos in the next section.)
First we cut a larger-diameter round hole (say 2.5") through the finish flooring using our hole saw's larger cutting blade. We remove and save the wooden plug created by this step.
Second we cut a smaller-diameter round hole (say 2") through the subflooring to expose the cavity below.
We examine the exposed and inner or hidden surfaces of each plug which is cut, as well as any rosin paper or other material that may be installed between layers of flooring.
Finally, using a flashlight and often a borescope as well, we explore the floor cavity itself for evidence of visible mold, organic mold-friendly debris, insect activity, or evidence of leaks or flooding.
What is the best way to take a sample of a 3 layer plaster ceiling? i've come across these hole cutter like core sampling things at wondermakers . com that seem neat but would just chiseling create less dust?
This question was posted originally at ASBESTOS LIST of PRODUCTS
At TEST CUTS for MOLD in BUILDING CAVITIES you'll see a photo of making use of a simple hole saw that cuts a very nice plug that can be used to examine layers of material or to prepare a lab sample for an analysis. Choose a plug depth adequate to get all of the thickness you need and a hole diameter that is no larger than necessary so as to minimize the repair work.
I agree that using any power saw makes more airborne dust than cutting by hand, but I do not recommend attacking the ceiling with a chisel. You risk breaking plaster ears through the lath and causing more wide-spread damage or worse, causing whole sections of plaster to fall off of the ceiling.
You can control the dust from the hole saw during sample plug cutting by keeping a shop vac or HEPA vac hose next to the cut area. And of course wear appropriate eye and respiratory protection.
It's a good question; I'll post our conversation over at the discussion of use of the hole saw.
The company that you promote with your question, WonderMakers Environmental, sells asbestos bulk sampling equipment including a handle and plunger for cutting core samples of material. You're going to spend perhaps $140. to ten times that amount for asbestos bulk sampling materials - a cost that may not be appropriate for sampling plaster but that may indeed be appropriate for professional environmental inspectors. An advantage of the company's core sampler system, particularly for people whose work requires frequent bulk material sampling is that the owner claims (in company rep. Michael's instructional video) that personal protection equipment is not required.
Use of the core sampler is also preceded by pre-wetting of the asbestos pipe insulation and succeeded by injecting a replacement insulation into the core sampled opening.
Both methods include sealing the sample area with a suitable adhesive tape such as duct tape or foil tape.
Watch out: the WonderMaker's core sampler is demonstrated on asbestos pipe insulation - a rather soft material traditionally sampled by wetting the material and cutting a sample with a "box knife" or drywall knife aka "razor knife" and that can also be sampled by the core sampler. It is notable that in the WonderMaker's demonstration video of the traditional knife-cutting asbestos sampling procedure no protective gear was used though the demonstrator comments that this procedure is "pretty dusty". Whether or not this core sampler cuts hard plaster surfaces with the same ease as what is basically soft-asbestos corrugated paper-like material has not been discussed.
Really? Is bulk testing always needed? As we document at ASBESTOS PIPE-INSULATION and also at ASBESTOS PHOTO GUIDE to MATERIALS there are some well-known asbestos-containing materials including pipe insulation that are easily and reliably identified by visual inspection alone, as there was no alternative material that was used in that application and that looks the same as the asbestos-based material. In that case, except for very special circumstances such as perhaps litigation or scientific research on percentages and mixtures of asbestos-containing materials, the requirement for costly asbestos-testing of the material might itself be questioned.
Also see MOLD / ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERT, HIRE ? for help in deciding when a (costly) expert is needed.
Watch out: If you suspect that you're dealing with an asbestos-containing material you do not want to make a dusty mess; wetting the area, working with hand tools, or using dust control measures including a HEPA vac would make sense. In that case and IF I were confident that I could cut away or break away a plaster sample without causing more damage to the ceiling or causing ceiling sections to collapse, I might indeed try some cutting with a sharp thin-bladed chisel. I'd still use dust control measures.
Small homeowner test cuts in walls: Make small test cuts in drywall in areas most-likely to have been wet. Don't make a big dusty (or moldy-dusty) mess. Keep it small and clean. You may want to re-seal test openings after using them, pending cleanup or further action.
Pull off floor trim at the floor/wall juncture in basements on walls suspected of harboring leakage - look on the back of the trim and on the newly exposed drywall for hidden mold growth.
Our photograph just above shows a small test cut made into a wall cavity above a most-suspect area where we saw buckled flooring. We believed that leaks below the floor had wet the building floor but also its wall cavities, risking hidden mold contamination. The small test cut above led to the demolition shown with the drywall removal shown below. Click to enlarge these images and you can see extensive dark mold contamination throughout the wall cavities.
Our lab testing found that a dominant mold in this New York City apartment was Memnoniella echinata, a highly irritating and harmful mold closely related to the infamously media-popularized "toxic black mold" Stachybotrys chartarum.
Details of this wall cavity contamination investigation procedure are at HIDDEN MOLD in CEILINGS / WALLS.
Larger wall cut openings: We may make a larger cut if external evidence such as staining or rot are strong suggestions of a wet, damaged, or moldy wall cavity.
In the moldy drywall exploration test cut example shown you can see a water stain just above the upper horizontal line of this test cut in a basement corner. We cut the drywall because of a combination of factors that elevated the risk of hidden mold in this area:
In the wall we found evidence of a history of plumbing leaks from a drain that the homeowner did not know was even in this wall (center of the cut out area); we found evidence of a severe rodent infestation (right stud bay of the cutout area); and we found visibly wet, moldy insulation in the test cut area (left stud bay in the cutout area).
If there is a large mold reservoir discovered in an otherwise "clean looking" building, you'll want to close up the test cut made above, taping the seams with masking tape, to avoid exposing building occupants to problematic mold while waiting for further investigation and cleaning by a professional.
Random wall test openings: We have little confidence in and are reluctant to simply make random test cuts in buildings. Since water can take peculiar paths through hidden openings, such as wall plate holes drilled for pipes or electrical wiring or between single pairs of studs or ceiling or floor joists, cutting a hole that does not reveal a problem is no assurance at all that no hidden mold problems exist.
When there is an ongoing building complaint that makes us suspect hidden leaks or mold, if we strongly suspect a hidden mold problem but have not found its precise location, on occasion it is justified to make a "strip cut" across multiple wall studs or ceiling joists, exposing multiple wall cavities.
Carefully peel back wallpaper under windows where there has been leakage, or in bathrooms over and near showers. Mold often grows on paper wallpaper backing or on wallpaper glue in areas that have been wet.
See this WARNING about peeling back large areas of wall paper - found in HIDDEN MOLD, HOW TO FIND
Watch out: just a light touch is needed. Don't try to investigate a building by dashing about with an axe cutting holes willy-nilly. That is an unnecessarily and inappropriately destructive approach to studying a property. But when building history, occupant complaints, or direct site observation of site and building conditions raise the level of probability of an important hidden leak or other damage, directed exploration, often with very modest means, can be very productive.
Continue reading at HIDDEN MOLD in FLOOR / SUB-FLOORING - test cuts into flooring layers from below avoids cosmetic damage, or select a topic from closely-related articles below, or see our complete INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES below.
Or see ASBESTOS LIST of PRODUCTS
Or see DUST SAMPLING PROCEDURE using adhesive tape
Or see HIDDEN MOLD, HOW TO FIND - other methods
Or see MOLD / ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERT, HIRE ? - do you really need to hire an expensive consultant? Sometimes.
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Try the search box below or CONTACT US by email if you cannot find the answer you need at InspectApedia.
(June 1, 2014) John said:
I am buying a Condo and Elevated mold levels (14000 aspergillus Pennicilum vs outdoors 600) have been detected by inspectors in two air tests. 2 Inspectors found No signs of visual mold, or any water in walls (thermal imaging), nothing under sinks, etc. There was a leak in to the bath ceiling 5 years ago and it was "caught and repaired immediately". AC is new -- only 1 year old but has some mold growing in 3 places. Seller wants to clean the AC system and ducts, do 2 days of air scrubbing and then do an immediate air test to see if the problem is fixed.
I am having the Bath ceiling inspected by having holes drilled and scoped and if needed cutting 6"x6" area.
Question -- without major construction -- just AC and duct remediation and air scrubbing, do we need 24 hours after the air scrubbing -- or can the air test be done immediately? Will and immediate test pick up another source of mold (not AC) if it exists -- or do we need to ewait 24 hours after air scrub?
Not much of this sounds sensible to me.
If a severe mold problem was found and repaired five years ago you would not be detecting high levels of indoor Penicillium sp. spores today.
I suspect the problem was never found, OR there have been other leaks and there are other mold reservoirs that need to be found and removed. This case illustrates why mold "tests" alone, without a competent inspection are not so helpful. We just have to visit the investigation de novo, this time, finding where the problem resides.
Please see (and continue the discussion at )
on how to find hidden mold
on making test cuts for mold. Scoping may not be adequate.
Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website