Sketch of a Recirculating Sand Media Filter System - EPA Using Single Pass or Recirculating Septic Media Filters

InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.

Single Pass compared with Recirculating Filter Septic Media Designs:

This document discusses the differences between single pass and recirculating septic media filter systems. Media filter septic systems use a conventional septic tank followed by any of several methods to further filter and treat septic effluent before it is discharged to the soil, soil surface, or waterway.

We also provide a MASTER INDEX to this topic, or you can try the page top or bottom SEARCH BOX as a quick way to find information you need.

Single Pass Septic Media Filter Systems

Sketch of an Intermittent Sand Media Filter System - EPA

Single pass media filers using sand, other natural septic filter media or manufactured/synthetic media filter media, are usually designed for effluent to be applied (dosed) using a pressure distribution system, typically a small-diameter perforated pipe.

The single pass septic media filter design permits effluent to be applied to the filter uniformly, in small, regular doses, permitting the filtering and biomat processes to do their work and avoiding overloading the system.

Other high-treatment aerobic septic systems use spray nozzles to distribute effluent over the surface of the media. See AEROBIC SEPTIC EFFLUENT SPRAY HEAD REPAIR.

Recirculating Septic Media Filter Systems

Sketch of a Recirculating Sand Media Filter System - EPA

A recirculating septic media filter system, in general, may be constructed using the same materials discussed throughout this document. What's different? A recirculating media filter system will be water tight (commonly using 30-mil polyvinyl chloride plastic (PVC) - so that it can process and then recirculate the effluent back to the pumping station.

Effluent cycles through the recirculating media filter a specified number of times before being later discharged to a dispersal system. A common design to make final disposal of the effluent uses a pressure distribution system to disperse effluent into the soil.

Where high levels of treatment of the effluent are achieved (see below), a biomat is not going to form so the absorption system can be expected to have a longer life.

A recirculating effluent septic system, by its ability to handle higher volumes of effluent or effluent at a higher rate, may be constructed with a much smaller footprint than a single-pass media filter. Recirculating media filter septic systems may also be better at reducing the nitrogen load in the processed effluent. Jantrania cites ratios of total recirculating effluent to incoming effluent as ranging from 2:1 to 50:1 depending on system requirements.

A typical recirculating media filter system, if constructed using sand, will be constructed in a watertight excavation and filled in layers, from the bottom up, 12" of gravel, 24" of coarse sand coarse (0.05-2.0 mm), topped with another 12" of gravel. The bottom of the recirculating media sand and gravel filter bed slopes (perhaps 1" in 8 ft) to drain to the return from the media filter to the pumping station. 4" PVC pipe returns effluent by gravity to the pumping station.

Wastewater is applied to a system of this design usually at 4-5 gallons per square foot of area of the media filter system's footprint. So a family of four, using 70 gpd of wastewater, (figure 300 gpd total, a commonly-used number which I am betting is low) would need only 75 sq. ft. for the filter bed if you believe these calculations. Naturally the actual system will be built with more capacity to handle aging, variations in efficacy, and variations in loading rate.

A recirculating sand media filter of this design can remove 30% to 70% of the nitrogen in the incoming effluent, and 10 to 30% of the phosphorus in the incoming effluent. BOD may be reduced from 175 mg/L (leaving the septic tank) to 20; fecal coliform may be reduced from 1 million or much higher MPN/100mL leaving the septic tank to perhaps 5000 to 100,000 MPN/100mL.

A recirculating sand bed media filter system produces highly treated effluent and has good removal of nitrogen. In part because of the larger sand used in a recirculating system, fecal coliform is not reduced as effectively as a single pass sand media filter or a peat media filter.

The life expectancy of a recirculating media filter system of this type and the frequency with which the sand needs to be raked or replaced, is not an easy statistic to find. I'll plug that data in here when I can dig it out from the experts.

Clearly a septic media filter system like this needs regular maintenance and more frequent attention than a conventional septic tank and drainfield. Figure on a regular maintenance contract with perhaps quarterly inspections of the return media flow (slowing indicates clogging), returning effluent quality, and proper operation of the pump and controls.

The University of Minnesota Extension Service estimates an annual operating cost including inspection, maintenance, and electricity of $200.-$500./year. This figure does not appear to include, however, the cost of periodic replacement of the media.

Septic Media Filter Articles


Continue reading at TEXTILE SEPTIC MEDIA FILTERS or select a topic from closely-related articles below, or see our complete INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES below.


Suggested citation for this web page

SINGLE PASS vs RECIRCULATING SEPTIC MEDIA FILTER DESIGNS at - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.


Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia


Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.

Search the InspectApedia website

HTML Comment Box is loading comments...

Technical Reviewers & References

Click to Show or Hide Citations & References

Publisher's Google+ Page by Daniel Friedman