Advice to buyers of a home with an FPE Stab-Lok electrical panel:
This article addresses the occasional claims by parties with conflicting interests, such as home sellers, real estate agents or attorneys representing sellers or other interests who sometimes state that there is no Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® hazard or cite the absence of a final government recall as a reason to assume that no action is justified.
The article also discusses the position of the U.S. homeowners insurance industry on recommending or requiring the replacement of FPE or other obsolete electrical panels in homes and notes that some insurers may require replacement of an FPE panel before issuing a homeowners insurance or fire policy.
We include links to public documents concerning legal and safety issues surrounding this equipment and we link to articles offering FPE panel replacement advice and money-saving alternatives.
Green links show where you are. © Copyright 2017 InspectApedia.com, All Rights Reserved.
The bottom line on FPE Stab-Lok® equipment: The FPE Stab-Lok® Panel is a latent fire hazard. The panel or its entire bus assembly should be replaced, not simply some or all of the FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breakers. Replacement cost ranges from $800 to $2000. There is no useful FPE recall, warranty, or other financial relief. See FPE REPLACEMENT PANELS.
Making printed copies of this document is permitted. Electronic reproduction or copying of our website pages and articles in any other form is prohibited, with this exception: we provide FPE Stab-Lok® Hazard Summary Page for Public Use that can be freely copied in print or electronic form and that can be copied (without modification) to other websites.
This Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® Electrical Panel replacement advice discusses the real hazards of FPE Electric Stab Lok panels and FPE circuit breakers.
Home buyers and home inspectors who encounter a difference of opinion about FPE Stab-Lok® equipment expressed by a home seller, seller's attorney, or real estate agent, sometimes report the view that because there was no US Government recall of FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panels, there is no concern regarding that equipment.
The articles and field reports at FEDERAL PACIFIC FPE HAZARDS are from neutral party experts, electricians, and home owners who make clear that the FPE Stab-Lok® circuit breaker
and panel hazard is a serious but latent fire hazard..
"Latent hazard" means, simply having an FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panel in a home does not itself initiate a failure or fire.
The problem is that FPE breakers often don't trip when they should in order to prevent a fire - at a failure rate of up to 60 % of the time - a much higher failure rate than most other circuit breakers.
Do not rely on electrical panel age, nor on an "inspection" by an electrician or home inspector or building inspector as "proof" that the electrical panel is or is not as safe and reliable as other brands. Don't rely on a home owner, seller, real estate agent, or anyone else who says "it's been fine so far" either.
FACT: Saying that an FPE Stab-Lok® panel has "performed just fine up to now" is not a reliable indicator of its safety.
OPINION: If you are never in an auto crash the fact that your seatbelt is hanging by a thread will never be noticed.
What if up to now there has been no evidence of a "failure" in a home serviced by a Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® electrical panel?
If you haven't seen FPE failures yourself (a sample of "one" is not statistically meaningful), instead see FPE FAILURE FIRE PHOTOS which is a collection of field failure reports, fires, overheats, and FPE problems which has over 130 entries (and more on file waiting to be entered).
In the Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® ™ panel bus assembly shown here, the equipment "looked fine" to the home inspector, home owner, home buyer, real estate agent, and everyone else, until the licensed electrician, someone familiar with FPE failures, removed a few circuit breakers to show the burning bus-to-breaker connections in the electrical panel.
Considering that only 2% to 5% of electrical failures are ever reported to any collecting authority, this is significant data.
Past history is no promise of future: Statements about this equipment by an owner or realtor that "there has never been a problem in this building" are not a safe
predictor of what can happen in the future. It may simply be the case that the circuit breakers have not been called-on to
respond to an overload condition. An overcurrent or short circuit - hazards against which circuit breakers are designed to protect the home and its occupants - may not have occurred at a particular property.
If no electrical circuit in the building ever has had a reason to trip a circuit breaker, no one will have ever seen the "FPE no-trip" problem. But when one of these breakers should trip to turn off power to prevent a fire, there is a significant t chance that it won't.
If you are looking for a federal recall notice you won't find it.
Although Federal Pacific Electric lost it's UL listing for a time, it subsequently went out of business. There was no product recall issued in the U.S. (There was a product recall of some Canadian products under the Federal Pioneer brand version of this panel.)
Instead of relying on the presence or absence of a government-ordered product recall, in this case we suggest reading the test data cited at the FPE Stab-Lok® information website, the court findings of fraud by FPE, and the many field reports of failures and even fires. The FPE hazard is real, well defined, and unambiguous.
The absence of a recall of FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panels does not mean the absence of a problem. Aluminum wiring
is a recognized fire hazard but was never "recalled". Do not waste time looking for an FPE product recall, FPE warranty claim, or FPE panel replacement money: there isn't any except for
a successful class action lawsuit that affects some New Jersey homeowners and an older Federal Pioneer (same product
different label) recall for some Canadian equipment. FPE and FP product recalls are discussed further below.
Extensive independent tests as well as field incident reports confirm that having a Stab-Lok® electrical panel is similar to the risk of having put a penny in a fuse socket instead of a fuse. The FPE Stab-Lok® photograph shown here is an example of a circuit breaker which failed with an arcing incident sufficient to burn out and blow out the side of the circuit breaker case. Pennies in fuse sockets are a recognized electrical fire hazard but have never been specifically addressed by recall nor by explicit legislation.
OPINION: Relying on a product recall is like believing that there is no crime because we have police departments or believing that there are no auto accidents because cars have brakes. There can be real hazards without a recall. There has been no recall of pennies put in fuse sockets, for example.
Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® (TM) panels and breakers are easily identified by markings on the panel front face (inside the door), writing on paper labels that may glued to the inside of the panel cover or inside the panel enclosure, the appearance of the circuit breakers, and unique appearance of the panel bus design (that breakers are plugged into).
Some of these details can be observed safely only by a licensed electrician who can remove circuit breakers but most of them are easily observed by a homeowner.
See HOW TO IDENTIFY FPE & FP for help on how to identify or recognize Federal Pacific Electric FPE Stab Lok circuit breakers and electrical panels - Product Identification photos and advice" helps identify Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® equipment.
Watch Out: we advise against purchasing replacement FPE Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok® circuit breakers or panel parts. Data indicates that these replacement parts do not perform more safely than old or original FPE parts, and other innate safety concerns with the panel and bus assembly also would remain in place. The FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panel and its part should be replaced entirely.
Do not just replace the FPE circuit breakers, and do not install substitute or "replacement" FPE breakers that "fit" in the panel. We have yet to be supplied with independent test data indicating that these new breakers perform any better than the originals, and we have received field reports of failures and burn-ups with "new" and "replacement" FPE breakers.
Furthermore, there are FPE panel bus, bus-to-breaker connections, and panel connection problems that appear to contribute to panel and breaker failures.
Replace the Panel If the electrical panel or circuit breakers are identified as Federal Pacific Electric or "Stab Lok" the electrical panel should be replaced and a new panel with new breakers installed. The FPE REPLACEMENT PANELS link at the "More Reading" links at the bottom of this article offers some alternatives and can save you some money.
The FPE Stab-Lok® electrical panel should be replaced. No new breakers, no inspections, no tests. Replaced.
Don't look to the government: We know of no meaningful program offered by any company nor government agency which provides financial assistance for the replacement of this unsafe electrical panel.
This FPE photograph is of the backside of the electrical panel bus assembly where an overheating condition and "meltdown" are occurring. This damage could not be seen unless the panel is taken out of the enclosure.
So who pays?: Home buyers and some home sellers often ask us who should pay for replacement of this unsafe electrical panel. Our opinion is that the panel is unsafe and should be replaced, but we are a neutral party with regard to who should pay for this repair.
Payment or allowance for addressing any substantive defect discovered at a property being purchased is a matter for negotiation between the parties, with advice from their attorney and real estate agent.
What does it cost?: Typical installation of a new 100-Amp electrical panel in the U.S. ranges from $900. to $2800. including parts and labor - not significant as a portion of value of a home. Some replacement methods (steel panel enclosure reuse) may reduce that cost in some cases..
Working in a tight space, installing a higher ampacity electrical panel, or other considerations might push this cost up closer to that higher $2800. figure. The cost of replacing an FPE Stab-Lok® panel can sometimes be reduced if the electrician agrees that it is suitable to re-use the original steel panel enclosure, inserting a new bus assembly and breakers, because the labor of rerouting wires is eliminated. That option is suitable only if the service size and thus the panel enclosure size is large enough to meet modern requirements. See REPLACEMENT PANELS.
OPINION: It is unfortunate when a building seller, real estate agent, or their attorney put the safety of future occupants of a building at risk by attempting to head off negotiation on this particular defect by asserting that there is no hazard. The risks are well documented by both field reports and independent lab testing. The cost to cure this common building defect is quite small compared with the value or purchase price of almost any building. An owner or real estate agent who is informed about this safety hazard and who fails to disclose this condition to another future buyer may be liable for real estate fraud as well as for any ensuing loss.
Because the safety of the future occupants of the building as well as the building itself are at risk, the new owner should assure that the panel is replaced, regardless of who pays for it. If the building is not being sold, certainly the current owner should have this safety hazard corrected promptly.
Our opinion is that a building seller is not required by state or federal law to fix anything and in fact could be assuming liability by doing so. However some lenders or insurance companies may require that certain safety or other building defects be repaired before issuing a mortgage or an insurance policy.
Our opinion is that similarly, a seller is not obligated to discount their property because of the need for an electrical panel replacement - that's something that is negotiable between buyer and seller.
But if a seller agrees to assume all or part of the cost of repairing a building defect in the building being sold, there are some reasons why it's better to give the buyer a fair allowance than for the seller to actually perform the work. By making an allowance to the buyer for the repair of an agreed-on defect:
It is important that any buyer be accurately informed lest the seller leave them with an unrecognized hazard in the building. In at least some states in the U.S. a seller or real estate agent who does not disclose a known, substantive property defect to a buyer could be liable for charges of fraud.
The cost of a new electrical panel is such a small portion of the value of a building that the need to replace the panel is not a reason to refuse to buy the building just as the need to repair automobile brakes is not, alone, a reason to refuse to buy a used car.
If you're asking about the size of an issue of denial of home owners' insurance because of the presence of an FPE panel in a home in the U.S., we don't have a quantitative answer but think it is probably only of modest impact.
There is no question that the FPE hazard is real; when a particular breaker brand can fail to trip as much as 60% of the time and 100% of the time after an overload on one leg of a two pole breaker, that's enormously worse performance than the industry where such failures in general are down in the .02% range. It's fair to note that there are other problem brands of panel and breaker too, perhaps with similarly high failure rates, but that have not been adequately studied, such as Zinsco, Challenger, &c.
Some readers and home inspection clients have reported that their insurance company denied a homeowners policy until or made it conditional on replacement of the FPE panel. (Interesting that they don't do that for proper aluminum wiring repair - eh?). Among those companies is State Farm, the largest insurer of homes in the U.S. since 1964. Other insurance companies have been named as having a similar policy.
Watch out: other online postings about the insurance industry's position on FPE or other unsafe or obsolete electrical panels offer dangerous advice such as "have the panel inspected by an electrician". The problem with this approach is that although visual inspection might disclose burned or damaged electrical panel components, visual inspection cannot detect latent hazards such as a breaker that is likely to fail to trip when subjected to an overcurrent. And in-place testing is dangerous too, risking a fire in the home or causing a breaker to fail later. "Testing" a two -pole FPE breaker by putting an overcurrent on one leg is very likely to cause it to jam and fail to trip in the future, causing a near 100% failure rate. An electrician cannot correctly pronounce an FPE panel as "safe" and is not going to accept responsibility for a later failure or loss.
What limits the scope or impact of of insurance company denial of coverage until an FPE or other electrical panel is replaced includes at least two facts: inconsistent policy denial policy within State Farm and other companies, and the comparatively low cost of the proper repair.
Yet some buyers and sellers balk at any expense or find it a reason to argue and negotiate. The conversion of a small but justified home repair cost into a topic of negotiation and delay is largely emotionally based and may involve buyers' remorse, anxiety, or other factors.
State Farm does not have a publicly available national policy on replacing specific brands of electrical panels but does note "out of date" equipment.
Stack Exchange has a posting by Grasper cites a State Farm advisory to replace FPE
DIY Chat room has a posting by user AARPY citing State Farm Advice to replace FPE
Originally Posted by AArpy View Post
No doc. Stopped in local ins office to insure a cottage in finger lakes. Am only repeating what I was told by a State Farm Agent. "Under no conditions will we insure a property with these breakers unless you get in writing etc,etc"
Angie's list notes the question; one poster notes that their insurance company advised having their FPE "inspected" - which as we know is a bad idea
INACHI has posted a thread on this at
among some posters the ignorance about FPE and even who owns what brand is stunning - but no specific insurance company was named.
Continue reading at FPE REPLACEMENT PANEL or select a topic from closely-related articles below, or see our complete INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES below.
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Try the search box below or CONTACT US by email if you cannot find the answer you need at InspectApedia.
Questions & answers or comments about the credibility of FPE Stab-Lok® panel hazards and the need for complete panel replacement, the absence of warranty claims and replacement cost assistance, the absence of a government recall and other FPE risk assessment confusion..
Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website