InspectAPedia®   -   Search InspectApedia

New building access ramp (C) Daniel Friedman Wood Board Cupping

Why do Boards Cup; Should Wood Boards Be Placed Bark Side Up or Bark Side Down when Building Exterior Decks or Stairs?

Bark side up or down on exterior wood decks & stairs:

This article series explains the causes of cupping in wood boards & wood board right side up advice for steps, decks, ramps: this article explains the causes of wood board cupping and gives advice concluding that unless a board is already badly cupped or has a "bad" side, when construction of outdoor decks and wood stairs you should place boards with "bark side DOWN" - that is pith side (tree center side) of the board facing up.

We include a warning about "shelling" damage on decks and steps - a phenomenon that occurs more on the pith side of boards.

Page top photo: in this wood-framed wall the top plate has been nailed "bark side up" - which matters much less in wood frame construction that will be covered by final building roofing and exterior walls.

In framing walls, our opinion was that all else being equal, we'd nail the top plate or sole plate of a wall with its arch "up" or "convex" simply because it was easier to nail the edges of the board down to the studs below.

There has been plenty of argument about bark up vs bark down. Field experience, FPL experts, and further discussion here all agree that because a bark-side-down deck board tends to arch upwards or actually to flatten as the wood dries, "bark side down" is the usually the best practice when building wood decks, steps, ramps, platforms.

Really? Well not always. We make an exception when flooring a deck or porch, especially outdoors, if a board is already so extremely cupped that it's not likely to flatten out if nailed with its cup facing up. We flip those boards over so that their high arch is "up" regardless of where the bark side is found.

InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.

- Daniel Friedman, Publisher/Editor/Author - See WHO ARE WE?

Cause of Outdoor Deck Board & Stair Tread or Wood Trim Cupping & Shelling

Why Boards Cup in the First Place: moisture differences dominate wood board cupping

End grain view of flat sawn board (C) Daniel Friedman

Which side should go "Up" when placing wood deck boards, stair treads?

The two fundamental factors affecting wood board cupping are moisture differences across the thickness of the board and inherent properties of the wood cells and cell distribution patterns that comprise the board.

Our photo above shows a pre-cut treated wood deck stair tread board. Although we see grooves cut by the manufacturer to serve as a walking surface (facing up in the photo) the board has cupped its outer edges upwards towards the bark side of the tree.

This cupping pattern shown above is consistent with the prediction of wood experts (wood tends to cup towards the "bark side" of the tree and incidentally, shows that this stair tread board is going to tend to hold water, grow algae, form ice, or otherwise be less safe than a board whose center had arched upwards. In use, if the upper surface of this board is usually wetter than its underside, it may tend to flatten out.

The extent to which an individual board will cup depends on those two sources of cupping movement combined with the wood grain pattern of the individual board:

Flatsawn boards like the one above will cup more than quarter sawn boards, and board cupping also varies by wood species, where the board was cut from the tree, and also by variations in the installed location and position of the board with respect to weather, rain, ground moisture, wind drying, sunlight and other factors.

Board guardrail top cupped towards the bark side (C) Daniel Friedman & Paul Galow, InspectApedia.com

Photo: Paul Galow's deck guardrailing top board, cut from near the heart of the tree, is almost quarter-sawn, and has still cupped significantly towards the bark side - the under-side of the board in this case.

Depending on from where in the tree a board is cut and whether it is flat sawn or quarter sawn, the board's future weather and water exposure, it may absorb more water in its wider, center tree-growth rings, expanding more in the center, tending to "cup" (towards the bark side) and so if the board's bark side had been "arched" upwards, it might flatten out.

Article series contents

If you're unsure about the how the wood grain will show up in different lumber saw-mill cutting methods, see the definitions of "flatsawn" or "flat-sawn" or "plain sawn" boards or lumber given

at LUMBER SAWING METHOD DEFINITIONS

Definition of Concave vs Convex Board Shapes

If you're not sure about cupping direction or the definitions of concave and convex, this U is concave (think "arch down" or think "fruit bowl") and this n is convex (think "arch up" or think "rainbow") - courtesy of James MacQueen Contractors cited below.

A concave board has its outer edges curled upwards while a convex-cupped board has its outer edges curled downwards.

Flat-sawn boards cup more than quarter-sawn boards.

Wood Cupping & Uneven Moisture Content

Cupped deck board, Two Harbors Green Cabin (C) Daniel Friedman at InspectApedia.com

Above: this ground-level deck board on an entry to "the Green Cabin" in Two Harbors Minnesota, is one of several that was nailed bark-side up and has cupped further so that in 2022, sixteen years after it was first nailed in place, the board is cupped enough to hold water after a rain, encouraging more algae growth and ultimately, rot.

Other boards of this deck that rotted before their sisters are illustrated

at ANSWER to BARK SIDE UP or DOWN

We think that an on-ground or close-to-ground deck board stays wet longer on its under-side so may tend to cup up regardless of bark position. Below we explain why.

Two wood board cupping truths that individual boards may not always obey:

  1. The wet side of of a wooden board tends to expand more than its dry side.

    The "expanding" side, by getting wider, will tend to curve or cup such that the center of that side arches or becomes convex.

    The moisture level may, in some boards, overcome the effect of the natural cupping towards the bark-side - point 2 below.
  2. Flatsawn boards tend to cup (form a concave or bowl-like surface) towards the bark side.

    The bark side tends to cup "towards" the outside of the tree or in the "bark" side direction.

    So if a board is installed "bark side down", the bark side of the board tends to form a "cup" with an "arch" facing "up".

The moisture variation contribution to wood board cupping occurs because when a wooden board has uneven moisture content across its thickness it will tend to expand more on its more wet side, causing that side to "arch" or become convex while the opposing side becomes concave or "cupped".

Outdoors, where despite temporary wetting from rain, deck boards and wood step boards are open to air on both sides, some, including chemists at the US FPL, are of the view that these boards will ultimately have a moisture content within 2% of uniform across the board's thickness. [38]

My view is that moisture content will vary across an outdoor deck board's thickness over time as a function of rain, snow-melt, or construction over wet, poorly-ventilated crawl areas. That is, a low deck's under-side may remain more-wet longer than its upper surface.

Wood Cupping & Tangential Wood Shrinkage

This moisture difference seems to dominate wood board cupping outdoors or inside even though wood experts often describe a different effect: tangential shrinkage and movement that leads the outer edges of flatsawn boards to cup towards the outside of the tree (towards the bark) and away from the heart, adding that the smaller the original tree and the closer to the tree's heart from which a flatsawn board was cut the more extreme will be its tendency to cup.

That wood board cupping is an old and long discussed topic is evident from US FPL citations such Clarke (1930) in the U.S. alone.

Finally, Cloutier et als (1997) noted that during wood drying, water conductivity was generally higher in the radial direction than in the tangential direction which, along with the presence and structure of ray cells in wood fibers, may help explain the actual mechanism wood board cupping that is either absent or confusing in most articles on this topic.[7]

A restatement of tangential wood shrinkage that may be more clear is to pose that wood shrinks more along the circle of its growth rings than across the thickness of the board.

By examining the end-cut of a flatsawn board, you will see that one side of the board will show longer arcs of growth rings (the side closer to the bark side of the tree) while the other side of the board (closer to the tree heart) will sport shorter arcs (growth rings).

Location & Length of Growth Rings May also Help Explain Board Cupping - re-stating Tangential Shrinkage Movement

End grain view of flat sawn board (C) Daniel Friedman

Our end grain view of a flat-sawn board shown above suggests a third possible source of wood board cupping: the pattern of growth rings through a cross section of the board.

In this photo (above), the long arches of growth rings would also roughly map the round tree shape from which the board was cut.

The winter wood (more dense) is marked by the darker growth rings in the board. The wider gaps of light colored wood are summer wood, a less dense growth of cellulose cells.

Cross section cut of lumber shows growth rings & maps the bark side of the tree, predicting the cupping direction

The long arcing of winter wood (red arrows) occur in the center of the board and arch upwards towards the bark side of the tree.

The thicker rings of growth wood, aka "summer wood" are marked by blue arrows in our photo below.

End grain view of flat sawn board (C) Daniel Friedman

The darker, thinner lines in our illustration above are also marking winter wood growth rings but notice that in a flat-sawn board these lines occur nearest to the edges of the board and that they also represent the typical end-grain of a quarter-sawn board illustrated below.

As we know that more shrinkage occurs across the width of a board through the flat-sawn long-growth-ring arcs (red lines) than will occur through the quarter-sawn end grain portion of the same board (blue lines) we thus have a third source of board cupping:

More shrinkage (as wood dries) wants to occur in the center of the board than in its edges. But how would this pattern explain the direction of cupping?

Notice that the longest red arcs are towards the upper or bark side of this board?

More shrinkage around the growth ring or arc line means more shrinkage where these lines are longest in the board - the upper center board surface in our photo will shrink more than both the board edges and more than the lower board center surface, thus tending to curl the board's outer ends upwards.

Wood Cupping Develops a "Set" in Boards

Ultimately boards that have cupped due to these moisture differences develop a "set" and remain cupped even when the boards have dried.

You can observe this dramatically in an interior wood floor that has been flooded, then dried. Boards will remain cupped.

Next: see ANSWER to BARK SIDE UP or DOWN

Hazards Caused by Cupped Wooden Deck Boards or Stair Treads

Poor drainage of upwards-cupped wood boards

Cupped ramp boards (or deck and platform boards) hold water and form algae or ice more quickly than boards that drain properly. They sometimes rot faster too.

Look at the end-grain of any deck, ramp, or wooden walkway board and notice the curved lines that mark the winter wood layers of the tree from which the board was cut.

If the visible curves (the darker colored latewood or winter-wood growth rings) are positioned such that the "cup" formed by these arcing lines is facing upwards - that is the convex side of the board and arcs faces up (opposite of the board in our page top photo) - then these boards that are cupped upwards and will drain more poorly, stay wet longer, rot faster, and in freezing climates are going to stay icy longer.

Watch out: Wetter boards also collect more algae and are a serious slipping hazard, especially on decks and stairs.

Watch out: Use common sense. Especially with pressure-treated wood that may have been soaked unevenly, boards may be quite warped when you are using them in construction. Before nailing a deck or ramp board in place, look at the board surface itself - sometimes the boards don't follow these "cupping rules".

Also see DECK & PORCH CONSTRUCTION.

Shelling Damage to Walking Surfaces on Wood Decks & Stairs

Watch out: As we introduced above in our US FPL quotation, on wooden decks and stair treads, a defect referred to shelling can occur with the bark side down method as this position tends to leave more poorly penetrated (by preservative) heartwood exposed to sun and weather.

Shelling is a term used by some builders to refer to the loss of portions of a board surface as late wood growth (the outer surface of the tree and thus the "bark side" of the board) separates from early wood growth (the inner portion of the tree or the tree-center side of the board).

Shelling is reported to occur more often in lumber made from Douglas Fir and Southern Pine.

When building an outdoor deck wooden stair tread, it is a good idea to avoid using boards with questionable, likely to separate, portions of their upper surface. Shelling may be less of a problem with wood trim that is to be placed vertically and kept painted or sealed.

For another safety tip when building wooden stair treads using 5/4 deck boards or 2x lumber, avoid using boards whose edge that will form the stair tread nose is, by inclusion of knots, chips, or other defects, likely to break away or form an uneven stair tread nose.

Uneven or irregular or chipped stair tread noses are another trip hazard.

See STAIR TREAD NOSE DIMENSIONS and

see SLIPPERY STAIRS, WALKS, ROOFS for details.

Bark Side Up or Down for Stacking Firewood?

Stacke firewood bark side up or down (C) Daniel Friedman at InspectApedia.com

Above: in Nancy and Edna's New York woodshed, the firewood is stacked with bark side up and down and mixed (left side of photo) but as the wood is reasonably-protected from the weather its position is of less concern.

The New York Times reported (February 2013) that the bark-side up or down debate rages unresolved in a related venue, the stacking of firewood by Norwegians.

People appear to be split 50:50 about whether it's better to stack split log firewood bark side up or down.

Having heated my home for years on firewood alone [DJF], and split and stacked a lot of wood, it's easy to understand the argument. [39]

Stacke firewood bark side up or down (C) Daniel Friedman at InspectApedia.com

These firewood logs are stacked roughly bark-side up and would, exposed to some wind-blown rain entering this open firewood shed, be a bit better at shedding water without soaking the wood. Stacked in the open this would be perhaps more important.

Bark side up: sheds water better, so we fantasize that the wood will dry out better stacked in that position. But bark side down exposes the two split sides of a roughly triangular split firewood log or a semi-circular split half-log to having its freshly cut and split side up and possibly exposed to more airflow.

Stacke firewood bark side up or down (C) Daniel Friedman at InspectApedia.com

Above: smaller-diameter round log firewood that has not been split can be stacked without worrying about "bark side up" - but of course will also dry out more-slowly than if it had been split.

Which did I find was better? Neither. What was more important was to cover the top of the woodpile to keep the whole thing dry. Stack the firewood so that it has good air circulation, and cover the top of the woodpile.

That made more difference than anything else ... except ... I found putting bark side down on the very first course of logs laid on the dirt seemed to invite bugs into my woodpile about 8% faster than if I stacked wood in the other orientation - for the first course.

Watch out: the slipperiness of a ramp varies enormously depending on what is on its surface, including algae, sand, dust, dirt, water, snow, ice, and even some add-on walking surfaces and paints.

At SLIPPERY STAIRS, WALKS, ROOFS we discuss the SCOF (static coefficient of friction) for wet algae-covered surfaces.

IPE Wood Deck Board Cupping

Reader Question:

Cupped ITE deck boards (C) InspectApedia ET

Three months after constructing a new Ipe deck some of the boards became cup shaped (see enclosed photos).

Soaking two pieces of the leftovers resulted in one of the boards sink and the other float.

Can this 'experiment' prove that some of the boards are not Ipe?
Awaiting your expert advice. E.T. by private email 2016/01/18

Cupped ITE deck boards (C) InspectApedia ET

Reply:

My opinion is that IPE, described by IPE Depot as " Ipe Decking. Ipe is an exotic hardwood that is naturally resistant to rot and decay, is 8 times harder than California Redwood, and is guaranteed for 20 years without preservatives!" - http://www.ipedepot.com/compare.htm

Should not usually float. A cubic foot of water weighs about 62.3 pounds. According to IPEDepot, a cubic foot of IPE weighs 69 pounds - it would sink in water.

Cupped ITE deck boards (C) InspectApedia ET

However as this is a "natural" product, I would not assume that all IPE boards are absolutely uniform in density or weight. So some boards or board cutoffs may be a bit under-weight.

Gibson (2000) points out that IPE is actually a broad term for a number of similar wood species. And White (2007) points out a range of densities among woods classified as "IPE". So your particular IPE deck boards may be less dense.

Furthermore, any natural wood deck board is exposed to cupping if the moisture differences across the board are significant.

Cupping will usually show the concave side of the cup facing the more dry side of the board - which is usually "up" on a deck.

Boards can misbehave and cup "backwards" for other reasons as we discuss ad-nauseum in our articles on deck board cupping beginning at the top of this page.

I'd look into the cause of cupping rather than thinking that if you'd had "better or more real" IPE no cupping would have occurred.

Watch out: there may be environmental and protected wood species issues with exotic woods used in decks or other construction. See Gibson (2000) who discusses chain of custody certification for IPE wood sold in the U.S.

Reader follow-up: Use fluorescence testing to identify IPE wood boards?

Thank you for your detailed answer with the valuable information.

It appears that the 'soaking test' is not absolutely conclusive to determine the exact identity of the boards.

Will the 'fluorescence test' (as described in links given below)

http://www.wood-database.com/wood-articles/fluorescence-a-secret-weapon-in-wood-identification/

Excerpt:

WATER EXTRACT FLUORESCENCE

Also, another trick to do with a blacklight is what is called water extract fluorescence and ethanol (alcohol) extract fluorescence.

Some woods, while they don’t physically fluoresce under a blacklight, will have very bright reactions when wood shavings and/or sawdust is mixed in a small vial or other clear container and held up to a blacklight.

An excellent example of this is Wenge: the wood doesn’t fluoresce, but something as simple as wiping the surface with denatured alcohol will serve to draw out and concentrate the heartwood extractives, and reveal a bright green fluorescence.

The proper way to test for this is to take some small shavings (or sawdust) and place them in a small glass vial with either water (for a water-extract test), or denatured alcohol (for an ethanol-extract test).

Alcohol typically results in faster, more vivid, extract fluorescence than using simply water, but water extract tests can be useful when some woods are known to not produce a water-extract fluorescence color, such as Brazilian Rosewood.

http://www.wood-database.com/lumber-identification/hardwoods/ipe/ [dead link 2024-06-22 - Ed]

http://www.wood-database.com/lumber-identification/hardwoods/cumaru/) / [dead link 2024-06-22 - Ed] be conclusive? - E.T. 2016/02/16

Reply: apparently not

I have not found IPE listed among woods that are easily identified with fluorescence testing. (Dyer 1988, Sum 1991, Pandey 1998, et als cited below).

Have you gone to the supplier of your wood to ask for documentation of where the wood was purchased and where it was harvested?

Wood Properties & Wood Identification

Hoadley's Understanding Wood, A Craftsman's Guide to Wood Technology, using the book cover and annotatios by InspectApedia (in yellow) illustrate some of the basic features of wood and wooden boards or timbers. Cited & discussed at InspectApedia.com

In this illustration, adapted from the cover of Hoadley's book cited just below, our yellow annotations point out some of the features of wood using Hoadley's cross-section of a tree.

[Click to enlarge any image]

What Wood is That - Edlin - at InspectApedia.com

Wood identification samples  for 41 common species (C) InspectApedia.com & Herbert Leeson Edlin

Mr. Edlin's wood identification guidebook includes actual samples of wood, as we illustrate just above, adding our own addition of Hickory flooring. - Ed.

Understanding Wood, R. Bruce Hoadle, Taunton Press - cited & discussed at InspectApedia.com

Timber and Trees Laslett's 1894 book available as a PDF download cited & discussed at InspectApedia.com

Wood Board Cupping & IPE Deck Board Properties

...




ADVERTISEMENT





Reader Comments, Questions & Answers About The Article Above

Below you will find questions and answers previously posted on this page at its page bottom reader comment box.

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs

Below: this photo is an Example for other readers - image of IPE Brazilian Walnut is from novausawood.com/

IPE Brazilian Walnut ovausawood

On 2023-06-07 by Wayne Perrier Concerned about Cupping on 5/4x6 IPE decking

hi, I have a deck being built that is 5/4x6 IPE decking and it is slotted on the sides so that a cleat system is used to hold the boards down instead of driving screws through the face of the wood.

The deck builder told me that it was the "nicest" IPE he has ever received.

We have alot of long boards, some 20 feet. the bottom and sides were stained with an oil or solvent-based transparent stain. the tops were left unstained and the idea is to let the boards dry out, come back and sand the tops and then stain it.

We are starting to see cupping -- it's only been installed about a week.

My deck guy says that if we had stained all sides "before letting the IPE dry out" then we would get alot of splitting.

I'm getting worried that the cupping will not go away on its own. Can you advise? It's about a 600 sq ft deck and we've put alot of money into it. Thank you in advance. wayne@perrierfamily.com

On 2023-06-07 by InspectApedia Publisher - IPE decking cupping or warping & checking

@Wayne Perrier,

Thank you for a helpful question about IPE decking cupping or warping & checking.

I'm sorry, but in my OPINION the process you described is almost guaranteed to cause deck board cupping.

You don't say how high above the ground is the under-side of your deck nor do you give country, city, climate, surface runoff conditions or other features that would affect the level of moisture under and around the deck, and I agree that often, once installed and initial drying has occurred, the area under a deck *might* be more-moist than above it - contributing to cupping.,

But in this case, coating one side of a board and then setting it out in the weather pretty much guarantees that there will be significant moisture differences across the thicknesses of the board. Just picture what happens at the first rain! We soak the board but its bottom is sealed - it's nearly a "cup" for holding moisture.

The fact that you said you expected the one-side-coated boards to "dry out, then come bacck and sand the tops and stain it" tell me that the boards were not dry at time of installation and that you coated one side - guaranteeing un-even drying.

If that's the primary moisture source (haven't had much rain?) then the boards would be expected to cup or arch "down" as the upper side dried more than the under-side.

But there's an opposite possibility: help me out - and embarrass me if you like - by telling me: are the boards cupped "arch down" or arched (convex or "arch up") ?

If there has been rain, then I would expect the boards to be absorbing more moisture on their un-coated side, causing more expansion of that side, that ought to make them arched, but, then I'm not sure I've got the whole picture here.

Now what are we going to do about it?

Given the cost and trouble involved I suspect you're going to end up trying to protect the deck from rain, let it dry out, and in the driest of your season (where are you ?) if necessary sand or even plane the exposed board surfaces flat, then for heaven's sake, seal all of the board surfaces uniformly.

An alternative would be to dis-assemble all of the deck boards, dry them out in your garage - to below 18% moisture- , then run them through a planer to flatten them out and assure that they are all of both uniform thickness AND that the clip-gaps along their sides are at a uniform distance in the board so that on reinstallation they'll be uniform and flat, stain/coat ALL sides of the boards, and re-install them.

Post some photos (one per comment) to show us what's going on.

For other readers, IPE decking is a Brazilian hardwood, also referred to as Brazilian Walnut. Although this is a hard wood, it's generally expected to air dry rapidly and with only minor checking, warping, cupping, or arching IF your boards are not particularly thick.

Thicker IPE wood such as 4x4 IPE posts or wider IPE boards like a 2x12 IPE are much more prone to cupping and have been reported cupping badly-enough to actually pull deck screws right out of the deck joists below.

Sealing ALL sides of your cut-to-fit IPE deck boards at the same time and staying away from wide boards like 2x12s can minimize the cupping problem.

But

Watch out: if you coat or seal the surface of just one side of ANY board it's going to be more-likely to cup or arch.

IPE Lumber Resources

CHARACTER GRADE IPE DECKING, LUMBER AND TIMBERS [PDF] from Tropical Forest Products, 1-905-672-8000 or 855-344-4500 info@weraetropical.com


Also see the US FPL WOOD HANDBOOK [PDF] that begins discussing IPE lumber on page 2-25.


On 2022-09-17 by Tom Ambalam Do I lay the board with bark side up or down for decks exposed to winter?

I read this article a couple of times but I am confused about the bottom line - on whether to lay the board with bark side up or down for decks exposed to winter.
The article starts with a premise that for decks , bark side should be on top. But the text below is so different.

On 2022-09-17 by InspectApedia-911 (mod) -

@Tom Ambalam,

Thanks, we're reviewing the text and will clarify it.

The topic is confusing and the right answer is found in detail at

ANSWER to BARK SIDE UP or

There we state

For flatsawn boards, if we want to follow the advice of wood experts cited at REFERENCES (https://inspectapedia.com/decks/Wood_Board_Cupping_Answer.php#reviewers) for this article, we'd put the BARK SIDE DOWN when setting deck boards or wood stair treads.

The technical basis and scientific support for bark side down are detailed at

BARK SIDE DOWN ARGUMENT.

BUT THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS to THE RULE:

Our object is for the arch or convex side of the board to face "up" so as to drain better and last longer, but we have seen in practice that sometimes a board doesn't cup the way we expect, so we inspect each board at the time of construction and if it's visibly cupped we will put the "arch" "up" regardless of the tree rings visible on the end of the board.

Thank you for the question; I'm working on the text.

If you return in an hour or more and clear or refresh your browser text you'll see the updated page and we will appreciate any further questions or critique.

DF & AC


...

Continue reading at ANSWER to BARK SIDE UP or DOWN or select a topic from the closely-related articles below, or see the complete ARTICLE INDEX.

Or see these

Recommended Articles

Suggested citation for this web page

BARK SIDE UP or DOWN on DECKS & STEPS? at InspectApedia.com - online encyclopedia of building & environmental inspection, testing, diagnosis, repair, & problem prevention advice.


Or see this

INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES: ARTICLE INDEX to BUILDING DECKS & PORCHES

Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Or see

INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES: ARTICLE INDEX to BUILDING STRUCTURES

Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia

Try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.

Search the InspectApedia website

Note: appearance of your Comment below may be delayed: if your comment contains an image, photograph, web link, or text that looks to the software as if it might be a web link, your posting will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. Apologies for the delay.

Only one image can be added per comment but you can post as many comments, and therefore images, as you like.
You will not receive a notification
when a response to your question has been posted.
Please bookmark this page to make it easy for you to check back for our response.
Our Comment Box is provided by Countable Web Productions countable.ca

Comment Form is loading comments...

Citations & References

In addition to any citations in the article above, a full list is available on request.

  • [1] The moisture content in wood varies depending on not only green un-dried lumber versus dried or kiln dried lumber, but also wood species, the ambient environment, and more.

    Green lumber that has not been soaked by rain or floating down a river may still have moisture at 30% or above; and wet wood that has been soaked may have 2 1/2 times as much moisture as that same wood species when it has been dried or kiln dried.

    Free water on or in wood dries quickly but bound water within wood cells takes much longer to dry or requires kiln drying or other measures for its removal.
  • [2] The fiber saturation point of wood or wood's FSP is defined as the moisture content of that wood when all of the free water has been removed.

    Picture the clothes in your clothes washer at the end of a spin cycle. The wet clothing has been squeezed until you couldn't get more water out of it - that clothing is at its fiber saturation point.

    And just as FSP varies among wood species, if you've ever done laundry you've noticed that some fabrics retain less water at the end of the washer's spin cycle than others.
  • [3] Glen D. Huey, "Why Wood Warps", Popular Woodworking Magazine, 12 July 2012, retrieved 7/17/2013 original source http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/why-wood-warps, reprinting from Woodworking Magazine, Summer 2009.
  • [4] Terrie Noll, The Joint Book, Popular Woodworking Books, Cincinnati OH, www.popularwoodworking.com Quarto Publishing, , Inc., 2002, ISBN 1-55870-633-x
  • [5] R. Bruce Hoadley, Understanding Wood, Taunton Press
  • [6] U.S. D.A. Forest Products Laboratory, "The Wood Handbook",
  • [7] Cloutier, Alain, and Yves Fortin. "A model of moisture movement in wood based on water potential and the determination of the effective water conductivity." Wood Science and Technology 27, no. 2 (1993): 95-114. -

    Abstract:

    A model of isothermal moisture movement in wood during drying using the gradient in water potential as the driving force is proposed. The moisture transport coefficient used in this model is the effective water conductivity. It is a function of moisture content, temperature, and direction of flow.

    The boundary desorption curve of the effective water conductivity function is established in the radial and tangential directions of aspen sapwood from nearly saturated to dry conditions at 20, 35, and 50 °C using the instantaneous profile method.

    The results show that the effective water conductivity increases exponentially with moisture content and temperature.

    The effect of temperature cannot be solely explained by the variation of the viscosity of water. The variation of the moisture content-water potential relationship with temperature would explain a large part of this effect.

    The effective water conductivity was generally higher in the radial direction than in the tangential direction in a ratio varying from 1/1 to 25/1 depending on moisture content and temperature.

    The flux-gradient relationship obtained at given moisture contents were found to be linear, confirming the validity of the model for the experimental conditions considered in the present work.
  • [8] Clarke, S. H. "The differential shrinkage of wood." Forestry 4, no. 2 (1930): 93-104. .oxfordjournals.org
  • [9] Boyd, J. D. "Relationship between fibre morphology and shrinkage of wood." Wood Science and Technology 11, no. 1 (1977): 3-22.

    Abstract:

    This is a study on the shrinkage of wood representing the wide range of morphology variation in leaning trees. It involved 13 trees of Eucalyptus regnans, one of Eucalyptus sieberi and four of Pinus radiata, and specimens taken at close intervals around the circumference of each.

    Data indicated a systematic modulation, between extremes at upper and lower sides of each stem, in longitudinal growth strains, relative proportions of thin, medium and thick-walled fibres, microfibril angle in the S2 layer of these, and both Klason and acid-soluble lignin content. Analyses indicated that the microfibril angle in S2 was a prime factor in influencing both longitudinal and volumetric shrinkage reactions; proportion of thick-walled fibres in the tissue, thickness of S2 relative to S1, and variations in lignification also were involved.

    Unusually thick-walled fibres were associated with visco-elastic strain recovery effects, which could form a substantial part of dimensional changes apparently attributable to shrinkage.
  • [10] Gu, H., A. Zink-Sharp, and J. Sell. "Hypothesis on the role of cell wall structure in differential transverse shrinkage of wood." European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 59, no. 6 (2001): 436-442.
  • [11] Barkas, W. W. "Wood water relationships, VI. The influence of ray cells on the shrinkage of wood." Transactions of the Faraday Society 37 (1941): 535-547. Excerpting: " "The shrinkage of wood is not the same in the three directions of the grain. It is greatest in the tangential (7) direction where the shrinkage per unit change in moisture content dr/dm lies for most woods between 0-2 and 0.4. In the radial (p) direction dp/dm is usually about half this value, while in the longitudinal direction ... [shrinkage] is much smaller, amounting to about 1/50th of the tangential."
  • Decks and Porches, the JLC Guide to, Best Practices for Outdoor Spaces, Steve Bliss (Editor), The Journal of Light Construction, Williston VT, 2010 ISBN 10: 1-928580-42-4, ISBN 13: 978-1-928580-42-3, available from Amazon.com
  • Steve Bliss's Building Advisor at buildingadvisor.com helps homeowners & contractors plan & complete successful building & remodeling projects: buying land, site work, building design, cost estimating, materials & components, & project management through complete construction. Email: info@buildingadvisor.com
    Steven Bliss served as editorial director and co-publisher of The Journal of Light Construction for 16 years and previously as building technology editor for Progressive Builder and Solar Age magazines. He worked in the building trades as a carpenter and design/build contractor for more than ten years and holds a masters degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Excerpts from his recent book, Best Practices Guide to Residential Construction, Wiley (November 18, 2005) ISBN-10: 0471648361, ISBN-13: 978-0471648369, appear throughout this website, with permission and courtesy of Wiley & Sons. Best Practices Guide is available from the publisher, J. Wiley & Sons, and also at Amazon.com
  • [16] Falls and Related Injuries: Slips, Trips, Missteps, and Their Consequences, Lawyers & Judges Publishing, (June 2002), ISBN-10: 0913875430 ISBN-13: 978-0913875438
  • [18] Slips, Trips, Missteps and Their Consequences, Second Edition, Gary M. Bakken, H. Harvey Cohen,A. S. Hyde, Jon R. Abele, ISBN-13: 978-1-933264-01-1 or ISBN 10: 1-933264-01-2, available from the publisher, Lawyers ^ Judges Publishing Company,Inc., www.lawyersandjudges.com sales@lawyersandjudges.com
  • [38] Sam Williams and Mark Knaebe, "The Bark-Side/Pith-Side Debate [PDF] The Finish Line, (A Forest Products Laboratory finishing factsheet), December 1995, U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, retrieved 9/13/12, original source http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/finlines/willi95b.pdf [copy on file as Bark_Side_Wood_FPL.pdf] R. Sam Williams and Mark Knaebe are researchers in Wood Surface Chemistry at the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705–2398
  • [39] Sarah Lyall, "Bark Up or Down? Firewood Splits Norwegians", The New York Times, 20 February 2013, p. A4.
  • Eric Galow, Galow Homes, Lagrangeville, NY. Mr. Galow can be reached by email: ericgalow@gmail.com or by telephone: 914-474-6613. Mr. Galow specializes in residential construction including both new homes and repairs, renovations, and additions.
  • Paul Galow [Website galowconsulting.com ] - technical consultant on networking, LAN design, applications support. Galow Consulting Services [Website galowconsulting.com ] , 914-204-1749, email: paulgalow@galowconsulting.com
  • In addition to citations & references found in this article, see the research citations given at the end of the related articles found at our suggested

    CONTINUE READING or RECOMMENDED ARTICLES.


ADVERTISEMENT