Winder stairs, angled, or curved stair specifications:
This document defines winder stairs refers to building code specifications, construction specs, and inspection details for winder, curved or angular stairs: stairs that make a turn without a landing.
We include sketches, photographs, and examples of defects used in inspecting indoor or outdoor stairs, railings, landings, treads.
The angled stairs shown at page top are not "winders" but also involve irregularly-shaped stair treads. That photo shows angled stair treads squeezing a stairway onto a New York City sidewalk.
Green links show where you are. © Copyright 2017 InspectApedia.com, All Rights Reserved.
"Winder" or "curved" stairs refer to stairways that make a turn without including an intermediate landing or platform to provide a flat rectangular turning space.
Angled or curved or winder stair treads are a particular trip hazard, especially because of the lack of uniformity and because the tread width at the inside of the angle curve can be too small for safe walking.
Any stairway whose treads do not have parallel edges - IRC R-202 - [14a]
By this definition a circular or spiral stair or curved stair is a winder stairway. What's different, then between a circular stair and a more generic winder stair?
Check the photos and descriptions of circular stairs and spiral stairs just above.
Winding or spiral stairways must have a handrail to prevent use of areas where the tread width is less than 6 inches (15 cm).
CA/OSHA Title 8 Section 1626 [paragraph (1) provides:
1926.1052(c)(2) Winding and spiral stairways shall be equipped with a handrail offset sufficiently to prevent walking on those portions of the stairways where the tread width is less than 6 inches (15 cm).
Watch out: we have on occasion seen placement of handrailings close to the origin of turning axis of winder stairs, such as shown by the red arrows in our photograph at left.
The stair installation shown above has no graspable handrailing along the left side of the upper portion of the stairway.
So the very handrail intended to prevent use of the too-small tread area actually does not form a barrier along those treads (it is installed on the last rectangular tread above the triangular steps) and worse, because of the lack of anything else to grasp, the walker actually has to hold on to a guard or rail that directs him or her to step precisely where we don't want - on the tiniest part of the tread.
The building owners added the vertical grab-bar and short "handrailing" shown (orange arrow) in our photo. Indeed this gives the stairway user something to grasp on-to.
Unfortunately it also directs the descending or ascending stair user to walk along the inside (red arrow) of several triangular stair treads.
By mounting the graspable handrail close to the innermost point or origin of the winder stair (or circular or spiral stair) turn, you encourage or even force stairway users to walk on the smallest (and most hazardous) portions of the stair treads.
Stairway winders As the sketch, courtesy Carson Dunlop Associates, a Toronto home inspection, education, and report writing tool firm, shows, only one set of winders should be allowed in a staircase, and the dimensions shown address tripping hazards.
This sketch shows the minimum tread width and radius for curving stair treads such as the stairs in our photograph above.
[Click to enlarge any image]
In our sketch below, also courtesy of Carson Dunlop Associates, you can see that a 90 degree turn is effected by three sequential triangular stair treads. Walking near the inside corner of this turn is difficult because of the irregular and small step area.
Below is a photo of curved or winding stairs that make a single 90 degree turn accomplished over the rise of the entire stairway. In either case, there is no intermediate landing.
In sum, stairway winders or turns involve triangular treads to complete the turn as you can see in our photo at right (note the handrail which is not grasp-able and not child safe).
As the sketch above left shows, in a staircase that actually makes a 90 deg. turn (as opposed to the curved stair at right) only one set of winders should be allowed in a staircase, and the dimensions shown address tripping hazards.
Of course more turns may be involved in a stairway than a simple angled or curved stair, such as the case of a circular stair, or a large, wide circular stairway that rises over a distance requiring an intermediate landing.
Our photos below illustrate several very steep winding stairways, first in the Mansfield Hotel in Manhattan, then in a less often used location, steep attic stairways in private homes.
At left our photo illustrates a beautiful stairway in the Mansfield Hotel on West 44th St., in Manhattan. This Beaux Arts style hotel, built in 1903, was designed by James Renwick and according to the hotel's own history page the structure was originally
"... built as a hostelry for well-heeled bachelors and socialites. Notables such as painter John Butler Yeats, father of the poet William Butler Yeats, stayed to experience a thriving New York following his immigration from Ireland.
During the 1950s, the Mansfield was home to Maz von Gurach, who was believed to be the inspiration for Jay Gatsby, from F. Scott’s Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby.” - Mansfield Hotel, New York NY "Stories" 
Most guests use the hotel's elevators, but we tried the stairs down from a seventh floor room.
The stair treads near the stair top are a bit risky, as the narrow inside corner of the winding stair treads is too small for most feet, while the handrailing, with an excellent graspable profile, is by force located on the inside of the turn, inviting stair users to walk closest to the most narrow tread portions.
I asked a guest couple how they liked the stairway as we descended together to the lobby.
"Beautiful, said one, but I would not like to have to run down these stairs in the event of a fire." - 
Below we see more serious stair trip and fall hazards: storing items on the stairs is of course another trip/fall hazard made worse in a narrow stairway where there is no room to bypass the items that should not be there in the first place.
Meanwhile in our next photo below you will note that the vertical stair ascent is so steep as to nearly comprise a ladder - a difficult stair to negotiate, exacerbated by the absence of any grab rail.
Our stair photo at shows tricky angled stairs that were squeezed onto a sidewalk in New York City. A passerby agreed to model the risk of falling.
In our OPINION the crypto-trip hazard at angled stairs such as these is the fact that the stair treads and noses are not parallel to the direction of travel. This hazard is similar to circular or winder stair hazards but without the too-small tread walking area.
But walking down these stairs in the direction guided by the handrail requires the user to step on stair tread noses that are on an angle to the direction of travel, inviting a twisted foot or ankle or possibly a fall.
AUSTIN TX MINIMUM LIFE SAFETY GUIDELINES (includes stairway details) [PDF], retrieved 2017/0-4/03, original source: https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/ default/files/files/Planning/Rules/backup15_04.pdf
RESIDENTIAL TECHNICAL REVIEW, City of Austin, Texas, retrieved 2017/0-4/03, adapting/excerpting from the 2012 International Residential Code with local amendments, original source:
Local Amendments - http://www.austintexas.gov/department/building-technical-codes
STAIR CODE, AUSTIN MN USA[PDF], City of Austin, 500 Fourth Ave. NE, Austin, Minnesota 55912-3773, Building Department (01/25/2008), Tel: 507-437-9950, retrieved 2017/0-4/03, original source: http://www.ci.austin.mn.us/Engineering/Building%20Dept%20Handouts/Stairs%20&%20%20Handrais.pdf
In the REFERENCES section of this article you will find more model codes and other key documents on building codes and stair and railing safety.
This is the main set of stairs to our front door. He says it's code.
Technically, the "pie" stair is a code "pie" stair - in measurement. But it's the use as a solo "winder" among regular stairs?
(The angled regular step at the bottom is no help, it just makes a third kind of step, so just one more variation.) AKA, is the use of a code step in a totally odd manner like this, still code? Still not set in concrete! My best, "Trippy" - Anonymous by private email 2017/10/17
[Click to enlarge any image]
What do you think about this proposed concrete stair descent? There's a single "pie: stair just dropped in the middle of regulation stairs.
We needed to remove the concrete porch top to be able to reach the sill of the home to have it leveled, so we needed a replacement concrete top after the leveling. Our porch had (has underneath cribbing) four lovely, smooth, 1930's, code, 6 1/2" x 11 1/2" steps.
But after we had the leveling, we were left with a rather ugly pin-pile bracket at the base of these stairs. The bracket was okay there, by us, okay by our city inspector, we were going to get a potted plant with a fake topiary tree for there and call it good. The old steps were great, craftsman, crack-less concrete. The home was leveled at the wooden sill, to avoid messing with these nice steps or messing with the concrete foundation.
The porch-top replacement concrete guy kept after us to cover the perfectly good steps to the porch with concrete to cover the pin pile bracket to be "safer." He finally wore us down. (He never said he was going to add a pie shaped stair in the middle of our run - or sub-grade our already steep lot, to add an extra stair, and increase the rise to 7" each.)
Maybe trying to pad the bill, maybe just not the smartest guy, don't know the motive. Not accusing anybody of anything, just want this changed if there's any precedent for this not being code or if it's irregular enough to raise an eyebrow with someone with sense.
We were not consulted beforehand, either, or about adding an extra step, or increasing the rise or having a middle pie step. Also, the very bottom stair was jack-hammered at one end to make it fit the pointy end.
After all the stairs were cribbed, we took our first look and were dismayed. This descent looks very, very tricky on the right side. Having the one pie step seems to ruin the whole right side, even though the rest of the stairs are standard widths?
Or am I nuts? Plus, the 'fin' of the bracket will not be completely covered on the left side, it will stick up a couple of inches - in the now second to last stair! And still my biggest issue seems to be with the right side, you can't hide that with a tiny tree. Our steps are only about 30" wide, now we won't be able to use the left or right side, it seems.
Where do people even walk? In your opinion, are these stairs walk-able? Also, because of the extra stair, there's a bonus picture of the approach to the side of the steps. The stairs used to tuck inside that brick wall. Please let me know if you'd want these steps for yourself, as your main entrance to your home. As soon as you can? No concrete has been poured yet. Thanks!
Well the stair might be acceptable to your local Building Code Compliance Authority, and emphasizing that that person is the final legal authority, I agree that the right side of the stairway is going to be and must be restricted so that people cannot step on the narrow portion of the triangle.
For a main entry stair I prefer a wide stair where, if a turn is necessary, we have a landing that gives adequate walking space on either side of the stair both ascending and descending.
So, if a code stair is used in an odd way, is it still code? Shouldn't the whole of the parts be the thing that has to be code? Interesting topic for debate? Hey, you can put our stair picture on your site and get votes!
P. S. That bottom step isn't a "winder," it's a regular step that's tilted, which still does absolutely nothing to make the right side of these stairs any more walkable, if you ask me, plus they're front door steps.
Bonus Info: Just for your reference, the stairs are only 30" wide to begin, already on the tight side, with a straight run, like we always had. Second bonus: We also will have a pin pile bracket metal "fin" sticking up two inches in that same concrete stair, on the left side.
That pin pile bracket is permanent, but we can change the right side, (the narrow pie side). I mean before it's poured, next Tuesday. Thanks, Daniel, for writing back. You sound so reasonable! My best, Jackie
Your entry stairway width is too narrow by most building standards - another reason to insist on meeting local codes including obtaining a construction permit and approvals.
Perhaps your code inspector is grandfathering in the stairway. But during a costly stair re-build, in my opinion, is the time to make the stairs proper and safe.
Citing a typical model building code on minimum entry stair width for a residential property:
Stairway width should be equal to or greater than 36" of clear unobstructed distance measured at all points above the [permitted] hand-railing height.
Keep in mind that even on a 36" wide stairway, once we allow for the intrusion into walking space of handrails that may be present along the building wall the walking space will be even more narrow.
The width of each landing shall not be less than the width of the stairway served. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of 36 inches (914 mm) measured in the direction of travel. R311.3 Floors and landings at exterior doors. There shall be a landing or floor on each side of each exterior door.
That 3 feet in direction of travel pertains to intermediate landings too.
See details about the minimum dimensions for stairways at STAIR DIMENSIONS, WIDTH, HEIGHT
Ultimately there are two concerns: the lesser one: obtaining approval from your local building department - the final legal authority, and the greater one: the prospect of an injury if someone falls down the stairs.
Take a look at the width of usable stair tread on the pie-step after you've blocked off access to the too-narrow portion of the triangular area.
The 30" stairwell width is one of two numbers we need to compute (or you can just measure the existing) the dimensions of the triangle. If you block off use of the triangle that gives 6" or less of walking surface the remainder is the width of the nose of that step.
I don't know what a pin pile bracket is - and want to see a photo; you certainly do not want an obstruction in the walking passage of the stair.
This step arrangement is now changed. So, it's just a hypothetical run, now. This never got sent to the city for approval. But I'd like to see what your forum thought, because I hope I'm not a jerk for insisting on a change.
Our contractor says the "winder" step was code, because it doesn't taper to less than 6," which makes it code.
But, if a code step is used in an odd configuration, like here, is it still code? Seems like dropping this solo "winder" step between regulation steps ruins the walkability of the entire right side of the steps. Or am I alone? I Forum input?
Never consulted on this arrangement before cribbing, so I hope I'm not a jerk about making the contractor change them, but wondered if I'd have to tear these (concrete) stairs out someday, if selling the house in the future. Wouldn't want that. Or having to tell visitors to "watch out for the steps," over and over.
We just couldn't accept this arrangement, and didn't ever have it run by us before this cribbing stage. This could have been set in concrete.
We were told by the contractor we didn't need a permit, but after seeing these stairs, we asked them to get one, and things have changed for the better since then. Thanks for your input, it made me feel I wasn't alone on this.
Be sure to review the stair width and stair approval with your local building department.
Sorry about the confusion on the width, which is 46" originally. The 30" is what's left when you avoid the right and left side of these stairs. My question for the Forum, is: Would you have to caution your visitors about the right side of these stairs? (Where the steps suddenly shrink to 6" in the midst of the run?). We have our fair share of older parents, little kids.
A 30" walkable path is more narrow than the 36" required by typical building codes for a stairway width.
Also my OPINION is that if something about a stair design forces the stairway user to walk too far from a readily-graspable handrail, that too will be unsafe, increasing the risk of a fall. Most people can manage to reach 16" out to a handrail, but if someone is walking down the right side of a 30" stair with a handrail only on the far side of 46" that may be uncomfortable or not "readily accessible".
OPINION: Also if you have a stairway with lots of children using it, you might consider an intermediate handrailing for them. That won't be required by your code officer but it'd be a nice safety feature as long as it doesnt' obstruct the stair passage - removable when the kids have grown.
Continue reading at STAIRS, RAILINGS, LANDINGS, RAMPS - INSPECTIONS, CODES - topic home page, a complete list of articles on stairs, railings, and ramps, their inspection, trip hazards, and good design, or select a topic from closely-related articles below, or see our complete INDEX to RELATED ARTICLES below.
Or see CIRCULAR & CURVED STAIRS
Or see CODES for STAIRS & RAILINGS
Or use the SEARCH BOX found below to Ask a Question or Search InspectApedia
Try the search box below or CONTACT US by email if you cannot find the answer you need at InspectApedia.
(Nov 27, 2012) salah said:
If I have a scenairo where I want to rerout my stairs on the 1st to the 2nd floor from an L shape to a U shape and having a landing in the transition will violate the headroom clearance. and then I want to add stairs to the 3rdh floor from the second with some headroom clearance issues too. The only way to accomplish that, i think, is to have winder stairs. Would there be a violation here? if yes, what is another way to account for that?
Why would winder stairs be a code violation? I must not understand the question.
If you mean that there are multiple turns in the stairs, yes that can be an issue as we cite in the article above. You can use a landing to make the turn.
Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website
OSHA estimates that there are 24,882 injuries and as many as 36 fatalities per year due to falls from stairways and ladders used in construction. Nearly half of these injuries are serious enough to require time off the job--11,570 lost workday injuries and 13,312 non-lost workday injuries occur annually due to falls from stairways and ladders used in construction. These data demonstrate that work on and around ladders and stairways is hazardous. More importantly, they show that compliance with OSHA's requirements for the safe use of ladders and stairways could have prevented many of these injuries. -osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/stairlad.html