Question? Just ask us!
Free Encyclopedia of Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, Repair
InspectAPedia ® Home
SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS
AIR CONDITIONING & HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS
AIR LEAK MINIMIZATION
AIR LEAK SEALING PROCEDURE
AIR SEALING STRATEGIES
BIOGAS PRODUCTION & USE
EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEMS
FLOOR FRAMING & SUBFLOOR for TILE
FLOOR POURED FINISH ON CONCRETE SLABS
FLOOR RADIANT HEAT Mistakes to Avoid
FLOOR TYPES & DEFECTS
FRAMING DETAILS for BETTER INSULATION
FRAMING DETAILS for DOUBLE WALL HOUSES
FRAMING METAL STUD PERFORMANCE
FREEZE-PROOF A BUILDING
FROST HEAVES, FOUNDATION, SLAB
GREEN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODES GUIDES
GREENHOUSE DESIGN for SOLAR HEATING
GREENHOUSE / SUNSPACE GLARE
HEAT LOSS in BUILDINGS
HEAT LOSS DETECTION TOOLS
HEAT LOSS INDICATORS
HEAT LOSS PREVENTION PRIORITIES
HEAT LOSS R U & K VALUE CALCULATION
HEAT LOSS RATE CALCULATIONS
HEATING SMALL LOADS
HOUSEWRAP INSTALLATION DETAILS
HUMIDITY LEVEL TARGET
INSULATION IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
INSULATION LOCATION - WHERE TO PUT IT
LEED GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION
LEED Building Designation & IAQ
MOISTURE CONTROL in BUILDINGS
NOISE / SOUND DIAGNOSIS & CURE
ODORS GASES SMELLS, DIAGNOSIS & CURE
PLUMBING SYSTEM INSPECT DIAGNOSE REPAIR
RADIANT SLAB FLOORING CHOICES
RADIANT SLAB TUBING & FLUID CHOICES
ROOFING INSPECTION & REPAIR
ROOF VENTILATION SPECIFICATIONS
ROOF ICE DAM LEAKS
SHEATHING, FOIL FACED - VENTS
STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS & DEFECTS
SUMP PUMPS GUIDE
SWEATING (CONDENSATION) on PIPES, TANKS
Thermal Expansion Cracking of Brick
THERMAL EXPANSION of HOT WATER
THERMAL EXPANSION of MATERIALS
THERMAL IMAGING, THERMOGRAPHY
THERMAL IMAGING MOLD SCANS
THERMAL MASS in BUILDINGS
THERMAL TRACKING & HEAT LOSS
VAPOR BARRIERS & AIR SEALING at BAND JOISTS
VAPOR BARRIERS & CONDENSATION in BUILDINGS
VAPOR BARRIERS & HOUSEWRAP
VAPOR CONDENSATION & BUILDING SHEATHING
VENTILATION in BUILDINGS
WATER SOFTENERS & CONDITIONERS
WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS
WIND TURBINES & LIGHTNING
WINDOWS & DOORS
WINTERIZE A BUILDING
WOOD, COAL STOVES & FIREPLACES
WOOD STOVE SAFETY
ZONE VALVES, HEATING
This article discusses the actual vs claimed performance of passive solar designs and an explanation of why those figures differed in a 1980's passive solar home design are detailed. Illustration at page top and accompanying text are reprinted/adapted/excerpted with permission from Solar Age Magazine - editor Steven Bliss.
Readers should also see PASSIVE SOLAR HEAT PERFORMANCE. Also see ROCK-BED SOLAR HEAT STORAGE DESIGN and see SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS our solar energy home page, PASSIVE SOLAR DESIGN METHOD, and SOLAR HOUSE EVALUATION. Contact us to suggest text changes and additions and, if you wish, to receive online listing and credit for that contribution.
Green links show where you are. © Copyright 2014 InspectApedia.com, All Rights Reserved.
A Probe of Passive Solar System Performance: is passive solar energy as efficient in actual use as claimed in theory?
Steve Bliss, associate editor, Solar Age Magazine
The question-and-answer article below paraphrases, quotes-from, updates, and comments an original article from Solar Age Magazine and written by Steven Bliss.
Passive Solar Performance: Actual, Claimed, & Evaluated
Many passive solar homes surpass the thermal performance goals set by their designers. This success is often the result of careful management and low indoor temperatures, or conservative calculations to begin with. IN too many homes, though, great performance comes only at the expense of good design, or worse - the homes demand a heavy sacrifice of comfort from the occupants.
Few such compromises were made in the architecturally ambitious Langley home, where careful consideration of living patterns and site issues remained a major concern throughout the passive solar project.
In addition to the usual siting and layout requirements of passive solar design, views to all directions were to be preserved, the solar collection space was also to serve as living space, and the heating program was to be flexible - providing heat only when and where it was needed.
Glass and lightly stained cedar interplay in the handsome geometry of the southern facade of the Langley house designed and built by the Bourgeois-Moran team. The brick mass wall in the sunspace provides a decorative boundary for the kitche workspace (see sketch below). Warmed air collected from the greenhouse in the upper plenum is ducted to the remote rockbed, which boosts the forced-hot-air auxiliary furnace. IN summer, clerestory glazing is opened for whole-house venting.
Architecturally, this house in western Massachusetts was and remains an unqualified success; the owners treasure their home. Yet thermal performance of this passive solar implementation at the time of this investigation was not encouraging. A close examination of the project suggested why passive solar performance goals had not been met and what steps might be taken to correct the problems.
As is the case with good custom homes - solar and non-solar alike - the initial design grew out of hours of conversation between the owners and the architect, probing their "philosophy of living" and feelings about the particular setting. Ken and Joan Langley and their teenage children were swept up in the design process. In their words, "we really got hooked on the idea of building when (we) suddenly realized how much the house would really be ours."
The plan provided for primary living spaces cantilevered over the south-sloping landscape toward mountain views and summer-shading deciduous trees. As cooking was a central activity of the Langley family, a large sunspace/kitchen area was designed as the spatial and thermal focus of the home.
With a hot-air above and rockbed below [for heat storage], the kitchen area would be the most consistently heated space. The adjoining two-story sunspace would function as both eating nook and circulation zone, therefore requiring few furnishings that might shade the direct-gain thermal mass. At the cost of losing a measure of thermal efficiency, the solar collection area was included as primary living space. R-9 night insulation was planned to minimize heat losses.
The Langleys were also a musical family. For occasional performances with family and friends, the expansive living room, opened up with west-facing windows, adjoins a raised music area. The platform serves nicely as an informal stage. Two teenage daughters [in the 1980's] needed smaller private spaces. The young women ended up with compact but exciting two-story bedrooms with large sleeping lofts.
All the rooms that face south can be opened to the sunny core of the home. Operable doors and windows are opened or closed as passive heating or cooling is required. For primary space heating, the Langleys, who each worked but anticipated soon being empty-nesters, wanted a flexible program that would deliver high-grade heat to peripheral rooms quickly, and only as needed. A passive-hybrid, forced hot air furnace system was chosen for its simplicity and economy.
The environmentally attuned design team placed the garage to the northwest as a wind buffer with the driveway to the south for solar-assisted snow removal. Similarly, a woodbin to the east of the entry is exposed to the south to help keep the wood dry. Judiciously placed plantings and a sparing use of glass kept the northern facade relatively enclosed for minimal heat loss.
Design for Hybrid Heating in This Passive Solar Home
Choosing ducts, fans, and dampers over pipes, pumps, and valves, the Bourgeois-Moran design team, together with consulting engineer Bill Alschuler, designed a passive-collection, active-delivery forced hot-air system for the Langley residence. Air from the heavily insulated plenum above the kitchen/greenhouse area is drawn down to a 25-ton rockbed storage component in the basement where it is heated in winter or cooled in summer. [Also see BLOCKBED RADIANT FLOORS - SOLAR DESIGN and PASSIVE SOLAR FLOOR TILES, PHASE CHANGE].
Sketch at left (Barbara Putnam).
The conditioned air is then ducted in-line through a Thermopride multi-fuel furnace and is passed by an auxiliary electric resistance element before being fed to the lower rooms and children's bedrooms through operable floor registers. The master bedroom is open to convective heating from the living room below, which has a backup wood stove. [Wood Burning Heaters Fireplaces Stoves].
The design/builders could not find a multi-fuel unit with built-in electric backup that met local code requirements, so they were forced to improvise with less-than-compatible components and controls. In an effort to achieve the higher efficiencies sought in active system rock storage, the consulting engineer designed a reversing system (two-way flow) with separate collection and delivery modes for heating and cooling, and an additional mode for electrically-boosted auxiliary heating. In summer, the owners open vent windows in the upper air plenum to convert it to a thermosiphoning tower, which both vents the sunspace and draws cooling air through the house.
Assessing Thermal Performance of This Passive Solar Design
According to performance criteria supplied by the design team, the Langley home was designed to attain a Solar Savings Fraction of .37, an ambitious goal for New England, in this case requiring 460 square feet of south-facing glass. This figure indicates that 37 percent of the heat required to maintain design temperature would be supplied by solar energy. At this level of performance, 5 1/2 cords of hardwood, supplying 55 million BTUs of auxiliary heat, would be required to maintain the indoor temperature at an average of 65 degF. [Also see PASSIVE SOLAR HEAT PERFORMANCE].
In fact, in the heating season of 1981-82, the Langleys burned only 5 1/2 cords of hardwood, but design temperatures were not approached. Based on data compiled by the owner on a multi-thermistor Heliologic control module, house temperatures were as follows: while average daytime temperatures were maintained close to 63 degF throughout much of the house, the nighttime average in-house temperature dropped to 58 degF.
The kitchen/greenhouse area rarely exceeded the high 50's. After a sunny day with no auxiliary heat, the house averaged 60-62 degF. before sunset. On these days the upper plenum reached the mid-70's, the rockbed the mid 60's, and warm air to the room approximately 60 degF. The owners reported that air from the supply registers, even when warmer than room temperature, felt cold to the skin. It's not like the 110-120 degF. air that they expected from a forced hot-air heating system. [Also see PASSIVE SOLAR ENERGY MONITORING].
While the owners were very pleased with their home, with the thoughtful and imaginative use of space, the grand views, and fine detailing throughout, they expressed disappointment in the solar performance of the building. They reported that the rockbed did not work as expected, and, in fact, was not needed since overheating was not a problem.
On winter mornings, the Langleys tolerated a chilly kitchen, feeling it was the price they paid for the glass and the views. They also wished they had more control over temperatures in the master bedroom, which is always open to the living room below. When they warmed the living room by lighting the wood stove, they automatically warmed the bedroom above to a few degrees higher. The Langleys, however, liked to sleep in a cold room.
The design/build team felt that the owners did not fully understand the function of the rock storage -that it was a thermal flywheel meant to stabilize temperature swings rather than to supply high-temperature air to the registers on its own.
The consulting engineer, after being alerted to the problems, carefully rechecked his calculations and later visited the completed site. His measur4ements indicated a 35 percent reduction in insulation at the greenhouse due to shading (on a specific day of observation in early October, at 2:00 PM). He also noted the lack of nighttime insulation and, as water leaks had plagued the greenhouse glazing, he suspected high infiltration losses as well.
The consultant who performed the calculations assumed an unobstructed southern exposure, while the owners and designer had planned to leave trees for summer shading and landscaping. After some trimming of these trees, the owners estimated a 20-percent shading loss may still have remained.
As for the R-9 night insulation in the calculations, the owners planned to install some night insulation as soon as they had tackled the greenhouse leakage problems.
The lack of nighttime insulation alone dramatically lowered the SSF from 0.37 to just above 0.10, raising the auxiliary heating requirements by 23 million BTUs or almost 2 1/2 cords of wood more than the original 5 1/2 estimated.
The estimated shading coefficient of 20 percent at the sunspace would account for an additional loss of 6.6 million BTUS annually. If glazing repairs reduced air infiltration in the sunspace, greater savings would accrue as well.
The house as a whole had a relatively high heat loss compared with passive solar homes of similar size. This was partly due to the liberal use of non-south-facing windows and the inclusion of the greenhouse as primary living space. The amenities that resulted from these design decisions must certainly be weighed in the economic equation.
Assessing the Rock Bed Storage System for this Passive Solar Home
A reversing rockbed, when operated effectively, will perform at a higher efficiency than a simpler one-way-flow rockbed storage system. But the additional cost and complexity may not be justified in a passive-collection system such as the one designed for this home. Temperature gradients across the rockbed were too small to make much of a difference. [See ROCK-BED SOLAR HEAT STORAGE DESIGN.]
The designers, in retrospect, tend to agree. If the whole house were brought up to design temperatures by correcting the heat loss and shading problems, then the owners would probably be more satisfied with the rockbed as "flywheel". Fine-tuning the passive solar system so that control settings, air temperatures, and blower speeds are balanced for owner comfort could help further.
Despite the shortcomings in the home's thermal performance, the Langleys reported that "the home offers so much flexibility that we have found ways to make it do what we want." And as corrective measures helped bring the house in conformity with its original design criteria, it was likely to fulfill its promise as an exciting and working passive solar home.
Passive Solar Home Design & Build Participants & Specifications
This article is reprinted/adapted/excerpted with permission from Solar Age Magazine - editor Steven Bliss.
Here we include solar energy, solar heating, solar hot water, and related building energy efficiency improvement articles reprinted/adapted/excerpted with permission from Solar Age Magazine - editor Steven Bliss.
This article appears in original form (the PDF links just below) and an updated/expanded web article above.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
No FAQs have been posted for this page. Try the search box below or CONTACT US by email if you cannot find the answer you need at InspectApedia.
Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Search the InspectApedia website
HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
Technical Reviewers & References